IMAGE QUALITY ANALYSIS OF AN INDUSTRIAL INSTANT NON-SCANNING TOMOGRAPHY SYSTEM WITH DIFFERENT COLLIMATORS

Alexandre França Velo; Alexandre Gimenes Alvarez; Margarida Mizue Hamada; Carlos Henrique de Mesquita

doi:10.15392/bjrs.v7i2A.561

Autores/as

Alexandre França Velo Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares - IPEN/CNEN-SP ,
Alexandre Gimenes Alvarez Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares - IPEN/CNEN-SP
Margarida Mizue Hamada Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares - IPEN/CNEN-SP
Carlos Henrique de Mesquita Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares - IPEN/CNEN-SP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v7i2A.561

Palabras clave:

Collimators, Industrial Tomography, Monte Carlo Simulation

Resumen

The greatest impact of the computed tomography (CT) applications currently occurs in medicine. In industry there is much interest of using CT in order to know the interior of: (i) industrial objects; (ii) machines and their means of production. The purpose of this tomography is to: (a) control the quality of the final product and (b) optimize production and analyze the quality of the means of production. An instant non-scanning tomography system is being developed at the IPEN. This tomography comprised different collimators was simulated with Monte Carlo using the MCNP4C. The image quality was evaluated with Matlab® 2013b analyzing the contrast to noise (CNR), root mean square ratio (RMSE), signal to noise ratio (SNR) and the spatial resolution by the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF(f)), to identify which collimator fits better to the tomography in development. It was simulated three situations; (i) with no collimator; (ii) ø 25x 50 mm² cylindrical collimator with a septum of ø5.0 x 50 mm²; (iii) ø25 x 50 mm² cylindrical collimator with a slit septum of 24 x 5.0 x 50 mm³. RMSE values for no collimator presented better results. CNR showed that no collimator and slit collimator reaches the same CNR values, but no collimator decreases more than the slit collimator as the number of iteration rises. The hole collimator reaches a higher CNR value, however decreases more than the others. The spatial resolution with no collimator and slit collimator were around 31.9 mm, and for the hole collimator was around 20 mm

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

CHAOUKI, J, LARACHI, F, DUDUKOVIC, M.P. Non-Invasive Monitoring of Multiphase Flows. In: CHAOUKI, J, LARACHI, F, DUDUKOVIC, M.P Computer-assisted gamma and X-ray tomography: Application to multiphase flow In Non-Invasive Monitoring of Multiphase Flows, 1st ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997; p 47 - 97.

ISMAILA, I., GAMIOB J.C. Tomography for multi-phase flow measurement in the oil industry. Flow measurement and instrumentation. v. 16, p. 145-155, 2002.

VELO A.F, HAMADA M.M., CARVALHO D.V.S., MARTINS J.F.T, MESQUITA C.H., A portable tomography system with seventy detectors and five gamma-ray sources in fan beam geometry simulated by Monte Carlo method. Flow measurement and instrumentation. v. 53, p. 89-94, 2017.

JOHANSEN, G. A.; JACKSON, P. Radioisotope Gauges for Industrial Process Measurements. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.

MAAD, R., JOHANSEN G.A. Experimental analysis of high-speed gamma-ray tomography performance. Measurement science and Technology, v. 19, p. 1-10, 2008,

FISCHER F, HOPPE D, SCHLEICHER E, MATTAUSCH G, FLASKE H, BARTEL R AND HAMPEL U. An ultra-fast electron beam x-ray tomography scanner. Measurement science and technology, v. 19, p. 1-11, 2008.

Disponível em <https://www.inl.gov/>. Acesso em 06 jan 2018.

PELOWITZ, D.B. MCNP-X TM User’s Manual, Version 2.5.0. 2005. LA-CP-05-0369. Los Alamos National Laboratory.

SALGADO, C.M., BRANDÃO L.E.B., SCHIRRU, R., PEREIRA, C.M.N.A., CONTI C.C. Validation of a NaI(Tl) detector's model developed with MCNP-X code. Progress in Nuclear Energy, v. 59, p. 19-25, 2012.

HADIZADEH H., MOWLAVI, A.A., THOMPSON, M.N., HAKIMABAD, H. M. Proper shielding for Na(Tl) detectors in combined neutron-gamma fields using MCNP. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics, v. 522, p. 447-454, 2004.

JEHOUANI, A., ICHAOUI, R., BOULKNEIR, M. Study of the NaI(Tl) efficiency by Monte-Carlo method. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, v. 53, p. 887-89, 2000.

CHRISTIANSON O., CHEN J. J.S., SAIPRASAD G., FILLIBEN J.J, Peskin A., TRIMBLE C., SEIGEL E L., SAMEI E. An improved index of image quality for task-based performance of CT iterative reconstruction across three commercial implementations. Radiology, v. 275, p. 725-734, 2015

SMITH, STEVEN W. The scientist and engineer's guide to digital signal processing. 2nd ed, San Diego, California Technical Publishing, 1999.

RICHARD S.L, HUSARIK D.B., YADAVA G., MURPHY S.N., SAMEI E. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: System and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. Medical Physics, v. 39, p. 4115 – 4122, 2012.

SAMEI E., FLYNN M.J., REIMANN D.A. A method for measuring the pre- sampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. Medical. Physics, v. 25, p. 102–113, 1998.

MAAD R., HJERTAKER B.T., JOHANSEN G.A. and OLSEN Ø. Dynamic characterization of a high speed gamma-ray tomography. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, v. 21, p. 538-545, 2010.