Core with unenriched MOX fuel for a Microreactor PWR

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2026.2928

Palabras clave:

Microrreator PWR, MOX, Reactor core design, SCALE

Resumen

Microreactors, with their compact design, high efficiency, and robust operational characteristics, represent a promising solution for clean and reliable energy generation, particularly in remote regions or emergency scenarios. A key aspect of the development of these systems is the diversification of nuclear fuels beyond conventional uranium dioxide, aimed at enhancing fuel-cycle efficiency, reducing radioactive waste, and mitigating nuclear proliferation risks. This work presents the conceptual design of a microreactor core using MOX fuel without uranium enrichment. Several initial compositions of PuO₂ + UO₂ were evaluated, and the mixture that yielded the best performance, discussed throughout the article, was 15% PuO₂ and 85% UO₂. This composition met all design constraints and enabled a fuel cycle of approximately 15 years, operating at microreactor power levels. The SCALE computational system was employed to define the fuel cell and to perform the core burnup calculations. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using unenriched MOX in microreactors, highlighting its potential to expand fuel-cycle flexibility and contribute to a more sustainable and diversified energy supply.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

[1] BRASIL. Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear. Com apoio da CNEN, Brasil avança no desenvolvimento de microrreatores nucleares. Portal Gov.br, 18 mar. 2025. Available at: https://www.gov.br/cnen/pt-br/assunto/ultimas-noticias/com-apoio-da-cnen-brasil-avanca-no-desenvolvimento-de-microrreatores-nucleares. Accessed on: 21 abr. 2025.

[2] Associação brasileira de energia nuclear. Combustível nuclear irradiado: um recurso valioso – não um resíduo. Available at: https://aben.org.br/combustivel-nuclear-irradiado-um-recurso-valioso-nao-um-residuo/. Accessed on: 21 abr. 2025.

[3] International atomic energy agency. Impact of High Burnup Uranium Oxide and Mixed Uranium-Plutonium Oxide Water Reactor Fuel on Spent Fuel Management. Nuclear Energy Series No. NF-T-3.8. Viena: IAEA, 2011.

[4] S. G. Popov et al., Thermophysical Properties of MOX and UO2 Fuels Including the Effects of Irradiation. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2000.

[5] National institute of standards and technology. Atomic weights and isotopic compositions. Available at: https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/Compositions/stand_alone.pl. Accessed on: 21 abr. 2025.

[6] Duderstadt, James J., e Louis J. Hamilton. Nuclear Reactor Analysis. Department of Nuclear Enginnering. The University of Michigan, 1975

[7] Kaplan, Irving. Nuclear Physics. Aguilar, 1961.

[8] International Atomic Energy Agency. Advances in Thermal Hydraulics: Proceedings of an International Conference. Viena: IAEA, 2022. Available on: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/IAEA-THPH_web.pdf.

[9] ELETRONUCLEAR. Informações de Angra 2. Available on: https://www.eletronuclear.gov.br/Nossas-Atividades/Paginas/Informacoes-de-Angra-2.aspx. Accessed on: 21 abr. 2025.

[10] LAMARSH, J. R.; BARATTA, A. J. Introduction to Nuclear Engineering. 3. ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2001. Cap. 8.

[11] TODREAS, N. E.; KAZIMI, M. S. Nuclear Systems Volume I: Thermal Hydraulic Fundamentals. 2. ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b14887

[12] VUJIC, J. L. et al. Small Modular Reactors: Simplified Designs, Safety Benefits, and Economic Advantages. Energy, v. 45, p. 288–295, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.078

[13] FRANCIS, M. W. Reactor Fuel Isotopics and Code Validation for Nuclear Applications. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2014. ORNL/TM-2014.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-05-22

Número

Sección

Original Articles