Retrospective study of radiation exposures during interventional cardiology procedures performed at the University Cardiovascular Center of Uruguay
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2026.2277Palavras-chave:
interventional cardiology, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, urgent angioplasty, delayed angioplasty, cineangiocoronariographyResumo
The number of interventional cardiology procedures has increased rapidly during the last decades. Fluoroscopic X-ray procedures, such as coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, are considered the largest source of medical occupational exposure, either for patients or operators, causing deleterious health effects. In this respect, several modifications in classical interventional cardiology procedures as well as the incorporation of radiation protection protocols for reducing radiation exposure have been developed. To adequately know the success in the application of these changes, the reference values of radiation exposure for different interventional cardiology procedures should be established. For this purpose, a retrospective, cross-sectional and descriptive study was carried out at the University Cardiovascular Center from the Faculty of Medicine (University of the Republic) of Uruguay between 2018 and 2020, with the aim to know the frequency of procedures performed as well as the average of delivered radiation dose, the fluoroscopy time and the Kerma-rea product for every interventional procedure. Urgent angioplasty procedure was the most frequent interventional procedure performed, producing the highest exposure level of occupational radiation workers and patients. It was established for the first time in Uruguay reference levels for the three most frequent interventional cardiology procedures using the third quartile of radiation exposure parameters employed (Total dose delivered, Kerma-area product and fluoroscopy time). Reference values obtained were in agreement with the ones found at international level.
Downloads
Referências
[1] JARAMILLO-GARZÓN, W.; MORALES-ARAMBURO, J.; PUERTA-ORTIZ, A.; CASTRILLÓN-GIRALDO W. Dosimetría personal y exposición ocupacional en Cardiología intervencionista. Revista Colombiana de Cardiología, vol 27, p. 52-60, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rccar.2019.07.004
[2] WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Efficacy and radiation safety in interventional radiology, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000.
[3] COUSINS, C.; MILLER, D.L.; BERNARDI, G.; REHANI, M.M.; SCHOFIELD, P.; VAÑÓ, E.; EINSTEIN, A.J.; GEIGER, B.; HEINTZ, P.; PADOVANI, R.; SIM K-H. ICRP PUBLICATION 120: Radiological protection in cardiology. Ann ICRP, vol 42, p. 1-125, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2012.09.001
[4] DURAN, A. Radiation protection in interventional cardiology. Arch Cardiol Mex, vol 85, p. 230-237, 2015.
[5] MOHAMMADI, M.; DANAEE, L.; ALIZADEH, E. Reduction of Radiation Risk to Interventional Cardiologists and Patients during Angiography and Coronary Angioplasty. J Teh Univ Heart Ctr, vol. 12, p. 101-106, 2017.
[6] VANO, E.; GONZALEZ, L.; CANIS, M.; HERNANDEZ-LEZANA, A. Training in radiological protection for interventionalists. Initial Spanish experience. Br J Radiol, vol. 76, p. 217-219, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/44376408
[7] PRATIWI, N.G.; ARDIATNA, W.; PAWIRO, S.A.; WIGATI, K.T.; SOEJOKO D.S. The optimization of radiation protection to interventional cardiologists. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. vol. 1434, p. 012002, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1434/1/012002
[8] CHEN, J.; EINSTEIN, A.J.; FAZEL, R.; KRUMHOLZ, H.M.; WANG, Y.; ROSS, J.S.; TING, H.H.; SHAH, N.D.; NASIR, K.; NALLAMOTHU, B.K. Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: a population-based analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 56, p. 702-711, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.014
[9] VANO, E.; GONZALEZ, L.; FERNANDEZ, J.M.; ALFONSO, F.; MACAYA, C. Occupational radiation doses in interventional cardiology: a 15-year follow-up. Br J Radiol, vol. 79, p. 383-388, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/26829723
[10] TSAPAKI, V.; AHMED, N.A.; ALSUWAIDI, J.S.; BEGANOVIC, A.; BENIDER, A.; BENOMRANE, L.; BORISOVA, R.; ECONOMIDES, S.; EL-NACHEF, L.; FAJ, D.; HOVHANNESYAN, A.; KHARITA M.H., KHELASSI-TOUTAOUI, N.; MANATRAKUL, N.; MIRSAIDOV, I.; SHAABAN, M.; URSULEAN, I.; WAMBANI, J.S.; ZAMAN, A.; ZILIUKAS, J.; ŽONTAR, D.; REHAN M.M. Radiation exposure to patients during interventional procedures in 20 countries: initial IAEA project results. AJR Am J Roentgenol, vol. 193, p. 559e569, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.2115
[11] KATARIA, V.; YADUVANSHI, I.; SINGAL, G.; NAIR, M. Establishing a diagnostic reference level of radiation dose in coronary angiography and intervention: A prospective evaluation. Indian Heart Journal, vol. 73, p. 725-728, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2021.09.012
[12] ELMARAEZY, A.; MORRA M.E.; MOHAMMED A.T.; AL-HABAA, A.; ELGEBALY, A.; GHAZY, A.A.; KHALIL, A.M.; HUY, N.T.; HIRAYAMA, K. Risk of cataract among interventional cardiologists and catheterization lab staff: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, vol. 90, p. 1-9, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27114
[13] CIRAJ-BJELAC O., REHANI M.M., SIM K.H., LIEW H.B., VANO E., KLEIMAN N.J. Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv., vol. 76, p. 826-834, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22670
[14] ANDREASSI, M.G.; PICCALUGA, E.; GARGANI, L.; SABATINO, L.; BORGHINI, A.; FAITA, F.; BRUNO, R.M.; PADOVANI, R.; GUAGLIUMI, G.; PICANO E. Subclinical carotid atherosclerosis and early vascular aging from long-term low-dose ionizing radiation exposure: a genetic, telomere, and vascular ultrasound study in cardiac catheterization laboratory staff. JACC Cardiovasc Interv., vol. 8, p. 616-627, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.233
[15] ROGUIN A., GOLDSTEIN J., BAR O., GOLDSTEIN J.A. Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol., vol. 111, p. 1368-1372, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.060
[16] GUTIERREZ-BARRIOS A., CAÑADAS-PRUAÑO D., NOVAL-MORILLAS I., GHEORGHE L., ZAYAS-RUEDA R., CALLE-PEREZ G. Radiation protection for the interventional cardiologist: Practical approach and innovations. World J Cardiol., vol. 14, p. 1-12, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v14.i1.1
[17] BATISTA I., TRUJILLO P., VIGNOLO G., DURAN A., MILA R., LLUBERAS R. Exposición a radiación del cardiólogo intervencionista. Acceso Radial Derecho (ARD) versus Acceso Radial Izquierdo (ARI). Temas libres premiados. Congreso Uruguayo de Cardiologia, vol. 29, p. 31-59, 2014.
[18] GRIMES, D.A.; SCHULZ, K.F. An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land. Lancet, 359(9300), p. 57-61, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07283-5
[19] SETIA, M.S. Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian J Dermatol., 61(3), p. 261–264, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410
[20] [20] ASCHENGRAU, A.; SEAGE, G.R. Essentials of Epidemiology in Public Health. 3rd edition. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2013.
[21] ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements). Patient dosimetry for X-rays used in medical imaging. Journal of the ICRU, vol 5, No 2. Report 74, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru_ndi016
[22] IEC IEC 60601-2-43:2010. Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 2-43. Particular Requirements for the Basic Safety 2nd Essential Performance of X-ray Equipment for Interventional Procedures. 2nd ed (Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission), 2010.
[23] ICRP Publication 135. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann. ICRP, 46, p. 1–143, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645317717209
[24] VAÑÓ CARRUANA E., FERNÁNDEZ SOTO J.M., SÁNCHEZ CASANUEVA R.M., TEN MORÓN JI. Niveles de referencia de dosis en radiología intervencionista. Radiología, vol. 55, p. 17-24, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rx.2013.08.001
[25] UBEDA, C.A.; MARTINEZ, D.I.; RAMOS, L.C.; VEGA-VARGAS, J.A.; RIVERA, T.I.; OLIVEIRA, M.V.; DALMAZZO, D.S. First Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedures in Adult Patients in Chile. Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection, vol. 37, p. 84-89, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/NTRP2201084U
[26] VANO E., KLEIMAN N.J., DURAN A., REHANI M.M., ECHEVERRI D., CABRERA M. RADRadiation cataract risk in interventional cardiology personnel. Radiat Res, vol 174, pp. 490-495, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1667/RR2207.1
[27] SIISKONEN, T.; CIRAJ-BJELAC, O.; DABIN, J.; DIKLIC, A.; DOMIENIK-ANDRZEJEWSKA, J.; FARAH, J.; FERNANDEZ, J.M.; GALLAGHER, A.; HOURDAKIS, C. J.; JURKOVIC, S.; JARVINEN, H.; JARVINEN, J.; KNEZEVIC, Z.; KOUKORAVA, C.; MACCIA, C.; MAJER, M.; MALCHAIR, F.; RICCARDI, L.; RIZK, C.; SANCHEZ, R.; SANDBORG, M.; MERCE, M.S.; SEGOTA, D.; SIERPOWSKA, J.; SIMANTIRAKIS, G.; SUKUPOVA, L.; THRAPSANIOTI, Z.; VANO, E. Establishing the European diagnostic reference levels for interventional cardiology, Physica medica, vol. 54, p. 42-48, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.09.012
[28] MCNAMARA, D.A.; CHOPRA, R.; DECKER, J.M.; MCNAMARA, M.W.; VAN OOSTERHOUT, S.M.; BERKOMPAS, D.C.; DAHU, M.I.; KENAAN, M.A.; JAWAD, W.I.; MERHI, W.M.; PARKER, J.L; MADDER, R.D. Comparison of Radiation Exposure Among Interventional Echocardiographers, Interventional Cardiologists, and Sonographers During Percutaneous Structural Heart Interventions. JAMA Network Open., vol. 5, p. e2220597, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20597
[29] ZOTOVA, R.; VASSILEVA, J.; HRISTOVA, J.; PIRINEN, M.; JÄRVINEN, H. A national patient dose survey and setting of reference levels for interventional radiology in Bulgaria. Eur Radiol., vol. 22, p.1240-1249, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2386-5
[30] AROUA, A.; RICKLI, H.; STAUFFER J.C.; SCHNYDER, P.; TRUEB, P.R.; VALLEY, J.F.; VOCK, P.; VERDUN, F. How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at a national level. Eur Radiol., vol. 17, p. 1621-1633, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0463-3
[31] GONZÁLEZ-LÓPEZ, N.A.; PARRA-RIOFRÍO, K.M.; BATISTA-ZALDÍVAR, M.A.; CARRILLO-VALLEJO, E.; YANCHAPANTA-BASTIDAS, V.N. Niveles de referencia de dosis para adultos en procedimientos de cardiología intervencionista en Ecuador. Archivos de Cardiología de México, p. 415-421, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.20000196
[32] KIM, J.; SEO, D.; CHOI, I.; NAM, S.; YOON, Y.; KIM, H.; HER, J.; HAN, S.; KWON, S.; PARK, H.; YANG, D.; KIM, J. Development of Diagnostic Reference Levels Using a Real-Time Radiation Dose Monitoring System at a Cardiovascular Center in Korea. Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 28, p. 684-694, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9773-9
[33] HUMAGAIN S.; MAHARJAN R.; KOJU R. Radiation Exposure to the Patient During Diagnostic Coronary Angiogram at Dhulikhel Hospital. Kathmandu University Medical Journal (KUMJ), vol. 13, p. 61-63, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v13i1.13755
[34] SIMANTIRAKIS, G.; KOUKORAVA, C.; KALATHAKI, M.; PAFILIS, C.; KAISAS, I.; ECONOMIDES, S.;. HOURDAKIS, C.J.; KAMENOPOULOU V.; GEORGIOU E. Reference levels and patient doses in interventional cardiology procedures in Greece. Eur Radiol., vol. 23, p. 2324-2332, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2813-2
[35] D'HELFT, C.J.; BRENNAN, P.C.; MCGEE, A.M.; MCFADDEN, S.L.; HUGHES, C.M.; WINDER, J.R.; RAINFORD L.A. Potential Irish dose reference levels for cardiac interventional examinations. Br J Radiol., vol. 82, p. 296-302, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/14857366
[36] GEORGES, J.L.; LIVAREK, B.; GIBAULT-GENTY, G.; MESSAOUDI, H.; AZIZA, J.P.; HAUTECOEUR, J.L.; SOLEILLE, H. Variations of radiation dosage delivered to patients undergoing interventional cardiological procedures. A monocentric study 2002-05. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss., vol. 100, p. 175-181, 2007.
[37] SAPIIN, B.; KH, N.; ABDULLAH, B. Radiation dose to patients undergoing interventional radiological procedures in selected hospitals in Malaysia: Retrospective study. Journal of the Hong Kong College of Radiologists., vol. 7, p. 129-136, 2004.
[38] TSAPAKI, V.; KOTTOU, S.; VANO, E.; FAULKNER, K.; GIANNOULEAS, J.; PADOVANI, R.; KYROZI, E.; KOUTELOU, M.; VARDALAKI, E.; NEOFOTISTOU, V. Patient dose values in a dedicated Greek cardiac centre. Br J Radiol. vol. 76, p. 726-730, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/73325000
[39] VAÑÓ, E.; GONZÁLEZ, L.; FERNÁNDEZ, J.M.; GUIBELALDE, E. Patient dose values in interventional radiology. Br J Radiol., vol. 68, p. 1215-1220, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-68-815-1215
[40] VAN DE PUTTE, S.; VERHAEGEN, F., TAEYMANS, Y., THIERENS, H. Correlation of patient skin doses in cardiac interventional radiology with dose-area product. Br J Radiol., vol. 73, p. 504-13, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.73.869.10884747
[41] SUBBAN, V.; AMELOT, S.; VICTOR, S.M.; POTDAR, A.; YADAV, V.; PATEL, T.; SHAH, S.; ALEXANDER, T.; JEYAKUMARAN, B.; ANGEL, J.; AJIT, M.S. Radiation doses during cardiac catheterisation procedures in India: a multicentre study: Radiation dose study. Asia Intervention., vol. 6, p. 25-33, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/AIJ-D-18-00044
[42] BROADHEAD, D.A.; CHAPPLE, C.L.; FAULKNER, K.; DAVIES, M.L.; MCCALLUM H. The impact of cardiology on the collective effective dose in the North of England. Br J Radiol., vol. 70, p. 492-497, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.70.833.9227231
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Categorias
Licença
Direitos autorais (c) 2026 Rafael Mila, Fredy Hernandez, Jaime J. Cordon, Ariel Duran, Wilner Martínez-López

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaro que o presente artigo é original, não tendo sido submetido à publicação em qualquer outro periódico nacional ou internacional, quer seja em parte ou em sua totalidade. Declaro, ainda, que uma vez publicado na revista Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, editada pela Sociedade Brasileira de Proteção Radiológica, o mesmo jamais será submetido por mim ou por qualquer um dos demais co-autores a qualquer outro periódico. Através deste instrumento, em meu nome e em nome dos demais co-autores, porventura existentes, cedo os direitos autorais do referido artigo à Sociedade Brasileira de Proteção Radiológica, que está autorizada a publicá-lo em meio impresso, digital, ou outro existente, sem retribuição financeira para os autores.
Licença
Os artigos do BJRS são licenciados sob uma Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Licença Internacional, que permite o uso, compartilhamento, adaptação, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio ou formato, desde que você dê o devido crédito ao (s) autor (es) original (is) e à fonte, forneça um link para a licença Creative Commons, e indique se mudanças foram feitas. As imagens ou outro material de terceiros neste artigo estão incluídos na licença Creative Commons do artigo, a menos que indicado de outra forma em uma linha de crédito para o material. Se o material não estiver incluído no licença Creative Commons do artigo e seu uso pretendido não é permitido por regulamentação legal ou excede o uso permitido, você precisará obter permissão diretamente do detentor dos direitos autorais. Para visualizar uma cópia desta licença, visite http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

















