Evaluation of Radioactivity Concentration and Radiological Impact for a Closed Open Pit Gold Mine

Abdalah Abdulrahman Kileo; Abubakary  Salama; Furaha  Chuma; Peter  Pantaleo

doi:10.15392/2319-0612.2025.2548

Autores

Abdalah Abdulrahman Kileo State Mining Corporation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9025-6488 (não autenticado)
Abubakary Salama University of Dar es Salaam https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6210-978X (não autenticado)
Furaha Chuma Tanzania Atomic Energy Commission https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6711-8252 (não autenticado)
Peter Pantaleo Tanzania Atomic Energy Commission https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8831-4912 (não autenticado)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2025.2548

Palavras-chave:

Terrestrial radiation, external radiation exposure, gamma ray spectrometer, Closed Gold Mine

Resumo

Evaluating radioactivity concentration and radiological impacts in soil, water and air is essential for both operating and closed gold mines, as geological settings, mining, industrial and agricultural activities can increase the natural occurring radioactivity level. The assessment is critical since the presence of radioactive elements can pose significant health risks and social problems. While most studies focus on active mining operations, this study targets the radioactivity concentration and radiological impact due to exposure of radionuclides of 232Th, 226Ra, and 40K for the closed open pit gold mine located in Nzega, Tanzania. In this study, gamma spectrometry was used for radioactivity evaluation and radiological impact assessment. The results indicated that, the activity concentration levels of 232Th radionuclides range from 17.4±2.4 to 133±13 Bq/kg, with an average value of 42.1±4.4 Bq/kg. The activity levels of 226Ra radionuclides range from 13.1±1.6 to 308±28 Bq/kg, with an average value of 82.8±7.9 Bq/kg, and the activity levels of and 40K radionuclides range from 101±15 to 1,119±103, with an average value of 461±45 Bq/kg. These activity concentrations were found to be above those mean values reported by UNSCEAR 2000 of 30, 35, and 400 Bq/kg for 232Th, 226Ra, and 40K, respectively, for natural radionuclides in soils. The radiological parameters calculated from the activity concentration were below the acceptable limit. The mean annual effective dose of 0.5 mSv/Year was below the ICRP recommended limit of 1.0 mSv/Year for members of general public. The average value of radium equivalent activity was 178.4 Bq/kg. The estimated average values of Hex (0.4) and Hin (0.7) in the study area were both below the desirable limit of 1. However, the radiological parameters at Re-handle were above the public limit and this requires mitigation measures. It can be concluded that no risk may threat the residents around study area except for Re-handle area which we recommends continued monitoring of radiation levels to ensure they remain within safe limits, and restricted access to this area is necessary to safeguard public health and environmental integrity.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

Abdalah Abdulrahman Kileo, State Mining Corporation

Directorate of Mining and Engineering Services
Abubakary Salama, University of Dar es Salaam

School Of Mines And Geosciences
Furaha Chuma, Tanzania Atomic Energy Commission

Directorate of Nuclear Technology and Technical Services
Peter Pantaleo, Tanzania Atomic Energy Commission

Directorate of radiation Control

Referências

[1] ABAD, M.; HERNÁNDEZ-HERNÁNDEZ, R. Environmental Recovery of Abandoned Mining Areas in Spain: Sustainability and New Landscapes in Some Case Studies. Sustainability, 2019, v. 11, n. 13, p. 3574.

[2] ADEBIYI, F. M.; et al. Occurrence and remediation of naturally occurring radioactive materials in Nigeria: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2021, v. 19, p. 3243-3262.

[3] ADEOLA, A. O.; et al. Advances in the management of radioactive wastes and radionuclide contamination in environmental compartments: a review. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2023, v. 45, n. 6, p. 2663-2689.

[4] ATANACKOVIĆ, N.; DRAGIŠIĆ, V.; STOJKOVIĆ, J.; PAPIĆ, P.; ZIVANOVIĆ, V. Hydrochemical characteristics of mine waters from abandoned mining sites in Serbia and their impact on surface water quality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2013, v. 20, n. 11, p. 7615-7626. doi:10.1007/s11356-013-1959-4.

[5] CATHERINE, N. Risk Assessment Due to Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials in Kilimambogo, Kenya. Kenyatta University Dissertation, 2023.

[6] ERASO, F.; RWIZA, M. J.; MOHAMMED, N. K.; BANZI, F. P. The influence of gold mining on the radioactivity of mining sites soil in Tanzania, 2021.

[7] FAVAS, P. J. C.; MARTINO, L. E.; PRASAD, M. N. V. Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation—Challenges and Opportunities (Holistic Approach). In: PRASAD, M. N. V.; FAVAS, P. J. C.; MAITI, S. K. (Eds.). Bio-Geotechnologies for Mine Site Rehabilitation. Elsevier, 2018, pp. 3-31.

[8] GITHIRIA, J. M.; ONIFADE, M. The impact of mining on sustainable practices and the traditional culture of developing countries. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2020, v. 10, p. 394-410.

[9] HENDERSON, R. W., SMITH, C. S., & JONES, D. T. Gamma Ray Spectrometry and Radiation Protection. Academic Press,2004.

[10] IAEA. Management of radioactive waste from the mining and milling of ores. IAEA Safety Standard Series No WS-G, 2002, p. 1.2, p. 27.

[11] IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). Soil Sampling for Environmental Contaminants; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2004.

[12] IAEA – TECDOC-1401, Quantifying Uncertainty in Nuclear Analytical Measurements, Atomic Energy Authority, July, 2004.

[13] IAEA. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards (GSR Part 3). International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2014.

[14] IAEA: International Atomic Energy Agency. "Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards." IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3, 2018.

[15] IAEA. Uranium resources as co- and by-products of polymetallic, base, rare earth, and precious metal ore deposits. IAEA TECDOC series, 2018, v. 1849, ISSN 1011–4289.

[16] IDRISS, H.; SALIH, I.; SALIH, B.; ELSHEIKH, A.; ABDALLA, I.; SAM, A. Environmental Impact Assessment of Natural Radioactivity Around a Traditional Mining Area in Al-Ibedia, Sudan. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 2018, v. 11, n. 4, p. 311-316.

[17] JARVIS, A. P.; YOUNGER, P. L. Broadening the scope of mine water environmental impact assessment: a UK perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2000, v. 20, n. 1, p. 85-96.

[18] KAMUNDA, C.; MATHUTHU, M.; MADHUKU, M. An Assessment of Radiological Hazards from Gold Mine Tailings in the Province of Gauteng in South Africa. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2016, v. 13, n. 1, p. 138. doi:10.3390/ijerph13010138.

[19] KEITH, L.H. Environmental Sampling and Analysis: A Practical Guide. CRC Press, 1996.

[20] KIVINEN, M. Sustainable post-mining land use: are closed metal mines abandoned or re-used space? Mineral Economics, 2017, v. 30, n. 2, p. 81-92.

[21] KWELWA, S.; MANYA, S.; VOS, I. M. A. "Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Intrusions at the Golden Pride Gold Deposit in the Nzega Greenstone Belt, Tanzania." Journal of African Earth Sciences 86 (2013): 53-64.

[22] MOHUBA, S. C.; ABIYE, T.; NHLEKO, S. Evaluation of Radionuclide Levels in Drinking Water from Communities near Active and Abandoned Gold Mines and Tailings in the West Rand Region, Gauteng, South Africa. Minerals, 2022, v. 12, n. 11, p. 1370.

[23] MOSHUPYA, P. M.; MOHUBA, S. C.; ABIYE, T. A.; KORIR, I.; NHLEKO, S.; MKHOSI, M. In Situ Determination of Radioactivity Levels and Radiological Doses in and around the Gold Mine Tailing Dams, Gauteng Province, South Africa. Minerals, 2022, v. 12, p. 1295. doi:10.3390/min12101295.

[24] MORRISON-SAUNDERS, M. P.; McHENRY, A.; SEQUEIRA, R.; GOREY, P.; MTEGHA, H.; DOEPEL, D. Integrating mine closure planning with environmental impact assessment: challenges and opportunities drawn from African and Australian practice. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 2016, v. 34, n. 2, p. 117-128. doi:10.1080/14615517.2016.1176407.

[25] MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A.; SHEPHARD, A.; VINNICOMBE, S. Managing Abandoned Mine Sites: Insights from an Australian Case Study. Environmental Management, 2016, v. 58(3), pp. 453-465.

[26] MHLONGO, S. E.; AMPONSAH-DACOSTA, F. A review of problems and solutions of abandoned mines in South Africa. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 2016, v. 30(4), pp. 279-294. doi:10.1080/17480930.2015.1044046.

[27] NOUR, K. A.; GABAR, A.; ARABI, M. Natural radioactivity in farm soil and phosphate fertilizer and its environmental implications in Qena governorate, Upper Egypt. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2005, v. 84, p. 51-64.

[28] OROSUN, M. M.; AJIBOLA, T. B.; AKINYOSE, F. C.; OSANYINLUSI, O.; AFOLAYAN, O. D.; MAHMUD, M. O. Assessment of ambient gamma radiation dose and annual effective dose associated with radon in drinking water from gold and lead mining area of Moro, North-Central Nigeria. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2021, v. 328, p. 129-136.

[29] RIGOL, A.; VIDAL, M.; RAURET, G. An overview of the effect of organic matter on soil–radiocaesium interaction: implications in root uptake. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2002, v. 58(2-3), pp. 191-216.

[30] SANTAWAMAITRE, T. An Evaluation of the Level of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials in Soil Samples Along the Chao Phraya River Basin. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Surrey, London, UK, 2012.

[31] SHEARD, M. Environmental Management in Mining: An International Perspective of an Increasingly Competitive Industry. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, 1993.

[32] THABAYNEH, K. "Natural Radioactivity Levels and Estimation of Radiation Exposure in Environmental Soil Samples from Tulkarem Province, Palestine." (2012).

[33] TREMBLAY, G. A.; HOGAN, C. M. Managing orphaned and abandoned mines – A Canadian perspective. In: Derelict Mines, CRC Press, 2016, pp. 57-75.

[34] UOSIF, M. A. Gamma-ray spectroscopic analysis of selected samples from Nile river sediments in upper Egypt. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2007, v. 123, p. 215-220.

[35] UNSCEAR. Effects and risks of ionizing radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, 2000, UNEP, New York.

[36] UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR 2008 Report. United Nations, 2008.

[37] VAISERMAN, A.; KOLIADA, A.; ZABUGA, O.; SOCOL, Y. Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues. Dose Response, 2018, v. 16, n. 3, p. 1559325818796331. doi:10.1177/1559325818796331.

[38] VAN DRUTEN, E.; BEKKER, M. Towards an inclusive model to address unsuccessful mine closures in South Africa. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2017, v. 117, n. 8, p. 741-747.

[39] Vos, I. M. A., Bierlein, F. P., Standing, J. S., & Davidson, G. (2009). The geology and mineralisation at the Golden Pride gold deposit, Nzega Greenstone Belt, Tanzania. Mineralium Deposita, 44(7), 751.

[40] ZIAJAHROMI, S.; KHANIZADEH, M.; NEJADKOORKI, F. Using the RESRAD code to assess human exposure risk to 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in soil. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 2015, v. 21, n. 1, p. 250-264.