Nuclear Power Plants event classification based on International Reporting System (IRS)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v8i3A.1282Keywords:
Event investigation, Operating experience, Incident Reporting System, Root causeAbstract
The exchange of information between several business activities can lead to an increase in productivity and quality. In nuclear area, besides economic benefits, the operating experience exchanged can increase of the safety level of nuclear installations. Thus, it´s necessary to evaluate frequently operational occurrences from different countries and companies to learn with their lessons learned to prevent a recurrent events or unexpected consequences. Because this, several methodologies are recommended to investigate events in an adequate level of depth and perform reports based on local requirements. Generally, these reports contain plant conditions before and after an event occurs (operation mode, operation limits and condition, date and time, nuclear and electrical power) and their information (failure discovery methods, impact to the safety, classification from INES and national regulation scale, similar events, relation to human factors, activation of emergency plan, recommended actions, root cause and causal factors). To allow the exchange of experience the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) maintain an Incident Reporting System (IRS) that permits interaction of several member states. In this system, a local coordinator collects information of the most relevant operating events and performs an evaluation of them based on IRS Guideline presented in an annual meeting. This paper evaluates a set of approximately four hundred events reported in IRS between 2014 and 2018. This evaluation has the objective of identify the most recurrent event root causes, operation mode and the effectiveness of corrective actions in course in the nuclear industry.
- Views: 115
- PDF Downloads: 161
Downloads
References
NEA - Nuclear Energy Agency. Comparing Nuclear Accident Risks with Those from Other Energy Source, Paris, France, 2010.
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Lessons learned from Challenger, Washington D.C, USA, 1988.
MEDEIROS, L. O. Abordagem da ergonomia para avaliação do treinamento simulado das equipes de resposta à emergência em lançamentos de veículos aeroespaciais. Dissertação de Mestrado. Natal: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 2015.
MOREIRA, J. F. M., d’ALMEIDA, A. L. Indústria de petróleo e gás: acidentes relevantes no mundo. III Congresso Nacional de Engenharia de Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 2018.
LE COZE, J. C. BP Texas city accident: weak signal or sheer power?. Resilience Engineering Symposium, Antibes, Juan-les-Pins, France, pp. 185-194, 2008.
ISIADINSO, C. BP Texas City refinery disaster – accident & prevention report. Exeter, United Kingdom, 2015.
MEJRI, M., de WOLF, D. Crisis management: lessons learnt from the BP Deepwater Horizon Spill Oil. Business Management and Strategy, v. 4, pp. 67-90, 2013.
PEDRAZA, J. M. World major nuclear accidents and their negative impact in the environment, human health and public opinion. International Journal of Energy, Environment and Economics, v. 21, 2013.
REMPE, J., FARMER, M., CORRADINI, M., OTT, L., GAUNTT, R., POWERS, D. Revisiting insights from Three Mile Island Unit 2 postaccident examinations and evaluations in view of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident. Nuclear Science and Engineering, v. 172, pp.223-248, 2012.
KORTOV, V., USTYANTSEV, Y. Chernobyl accident: Causes, consequences and problems of radiation measurements. Radiation Measurements, v. 55, pp. 12-16, 2013.
MAURICIO, C. L. P. Analysis of the external doses received by workers involved in the mitigation of the Goiania radiological accident. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, v. 6, 2018.
PYY, P., ROSS, D. F. Recurring events: a nuclear safety concern. NEA News, 21.2, 2003.
IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency. Best practices in the utilization and dissemination of Operating Experience at Nuclear Power Plants, Vienna, Austria, 2008.
CNEN - Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear. Norma NN 1.14 – Relatórios de operação de usinas nucleoelétricas, 2002.
IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency. Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Commissioning and Operation, Specific Safety Requirements (SSR-2/2), Vienna, Austria (2016).
ZIEDELIS, S., NOEL, M. Comparative Analysis of Nuclear Event Investigation Methods, Tools and Techniques - Interim Technical Report EUR 24757 EN, European Commission Joint Research Centre – Institute for Energy, Luxemburg, Luxemburg, 2011.
IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency, Development and application of level 1 probabilistic safety assessment for Nuclear Power Plants, Specific Safety Guide (SSG-3), Vienna, Austria, 2010.
IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency, Deterministic Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants, Specific Safety Guide (SSG-2), Vienna, Austria (2009).
MOHAMADFAM, I., SOLEIMANI, E., GHASEMI, F., ZAMANPARVAR, A. Comparison of Management Oversight and Risk Tree and Tripod-Beta in Excavation Accident Analysis. Health Science, v. 7, pp. 1-5, 2015.
IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency. IRS Guidelines. Vienna, Austria, 2010.
ERINC, J., SEAMAN, S. BAISCH, J. Common Cause Failure (CCF): A path to quantitative success. NPIC&HMIT, San Francisco, CA, pp. 246-255, 2017.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/