Image quality evaluation for two different positron emitters in a preclinical PET scanner

Authors

  • Rodrigo Modesto Gadelha UFMG https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-3087
  • Andréa Vidal Ferreira CDTN
  • Guilherme Albuquerque Cavalcante Souza UFMG and CDTN
  • Juliana Batista Silva CDTN/CNEN.
  • Marcelo Mamede UFMG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v8i3.1299

Keywords:

image quality, preclinical PET scanner, two positron emitters, NEMA NU 4-2008

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is widely used in preclinical trials, generating molecular images applied to biochemical, metabolic and functional investigation of organs and tissues. The positron emitters 11C and 18F radionuclides are relevant for different diseases studies. However, they have different positron energies, ranges, and branching ratio. This could result in a distinct quality between the acquired PET images. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the image quality performance of the PET scanner (LabPET 4, GE) at CDTN/CNEN using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards and specific phantom for these two different positron emitters. The NEMA image-quality (IQ) phantom consists of 3 different regions to analyze distinct characteristics: uniformity, recovery coefficients (RCs) and spill-over rations (SOR) in air and water. The IQ phantom was filled with two different aqueous solutions (18F-FDG and 11C-PK11195), both activities calibrated at the beginning of acquisition (3.7MBq). The IQ phantom was placed in the center of the field-of-view (FOV) and measured with the typical whole body imaging protocol. The images were reconstructed following the Molecular Imaging Laboratory (LIM/CDTN) standard protocol: MLEM-3D algorithm, 20 iterations, no high-resolution mode, no attenuation or scatter corrections, no post-filtering. PMOD® software was used to perform images post-processing following NEMA analyses standard. The %SD of medium concentration activity for 18F and 11C was 7.7 and 14.5, respectively. The RCs for 18F and 11C were 0.11 and 0.12 respectively for the 1-mm-diameter rod and 0.88 and 0.77 for the 5-mm-diameter rod. SORs in air were 0.19 and 0.22, respectively, and in water 0.29 and 0.33. Experimental results demonstrates that when 18F radionuclide is used, PET images presents a better performance in the image quality tests compared to 11C PET images.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rodrigo Modesto Gadelha, UFMG

Department of Anatomy and Imaging at UFMG of School Medicine

Andréa Vidal Ferreira, CDTN

SERAFI at CDTN/CNEN

Guilherme Albuquerque Cavalcante Souza, UFMG and CDTN

Department of Anatomy and Imaging at UFMG of School Medicine. SERAFI at CDTN/CNEN.

Juliana Batista Silva, CDTN/CNEN.

SERAFI at CDTN/CNEN

Marcelo Mamede, UFMG

Department of Anatomy and Imaging at UFMG of School Medicine

References

R. Yao, R. Lecomte, E. Crawford. “Small-Animal PET: What is it, and why do we need it?” Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology. Vol. 40 nº3, pp.157-165 (2011).

R. M. G. Gontijo. “Proposta de Programa de Garantia da Qualidade para Imagem Molecular Pré-Clínica”. 2019. 291 f. Thesis. (Doutorado em Ciência e Tecnologia das Radiações, Minerais e Materiais) – Centro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear, Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear (CDTN/CNEN). Belo Horizonte. In Portuguese (2019).

National Electrical Manufacturers Association. “Performance Measurements of Small Animal Positron Emission Tomographs”. Rosslyn VA; 2008 Standards Publication NU 4-(2008).

IAEA - International Agency Energy Atomic, “Live Chart of Nuclides”. https://www-nds.iaea.org/relnsd/vcharthtml/VChartHTML.html (2019).

GE Healthcare Technologies, “Triumph Service Guide Technical Publication”. Revision Draft 6, Copyright. http://www.gehealthcare.com (2011).

M. A. Tretault, et al. “System architecture of the LabPET small animal PET scanner” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol.55, pp. 2546-2550, (2008).

R. Fontaine, et al. “The hardware and signal processing architecture of LabPETTM, a small animal APD-based digital PET scanner” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 56, pp. 3-9, February (2009).

Gamma Medica-Ideas, User Manual: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scanner Software - Manual for Acquisition and Processing of PET Images from the LABPET System. Software version: LABPET 1.12.0, (2010).

BELCARI, N. et al. NEMA NU-4 Performance Evaluation of the IRIS PET/CT Preclincial Scanner. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2017. v.1, n.4, p. 301-309.

R. M. G. Gontijo. et al. “Image quality evaluation of a small animal PET scanner”Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences.Vol. 8 nº1, pp 01-13 (2020).

PMOD Tecnologies LCC, PMOD v.3.7. User Manual, (2015).

H. Zaidi and O. Ratib.“NEMA NU-04-based Performance Characteristics of the LabPET-8TM Small Animal PET Scanner” IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.pp. 3654-3660 (2011).

Downloads

Published

2020-09-27

How to Cite

Gadelha, R. M., Ferreira, A. V., Souza, G. A. C., Silva, J. B., & Mamede, M. (2020). Image quality evaluation for two different positron emitters in a preclinical PET scanner. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v8i3.1299

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>