Development and application of an approach for safety assessment of radioactive waste storage facilities for accidental scenarios
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v9i1A.1330Keywords:
radioactive waste, safety assessment, accidents, SAFRAN, occurrence probabilityAbstract
Worldwide there is a huge amount of radioactive waste, including disused sources, decommissioning waste, and naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) waiting for final disposal, the so-called storage facilities. Results of safety assessment of such facilities are usually required in decision-making during design, modification, safety improvements, periodic safety reviews, and licensing activities. Quantitative safety assessment methodologies used in many areas of nuclear industry involves the evaluation of risk through the definition of scenarios, likelihoods, and consequences, for normal operation and accidents. There are many techniques that can be used in each one of these steps. For screening the accident scenarios, qualitative techniques such as failure modes and effect analysis (FMEA) are available. For a quantitative assessment of occurrence probabilities of undesired events, logical and graphical tools such as fault tree analysis (FTA) are employed. Consequence assessments involve the dose assessment in the workers and the impact of the released materials in the environment and of public exposure to radiation. This work analyzes the application of these traditional safety assessment approaches to storage facilities and how they can be applied to complement specific methodologies used in this area, such as the Safety Assessment Driving Radioactive Waste Management Solutions (SADRWMS), implemented in Safety Assessment Framework (SAFRAN) software tool, made available by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
- Views: 218
- PDF Downloads: 203
Downloads
References
CNEN - Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear. Licenciamento de depósitos de rejeitos radioativos de baixo e médio níveis de radiação. Norma CNEN NN 8.02, Rio de Janeiro: CNEN, 2014.
IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency. Methodology for safety assessment applied to predisposal waste management. IAEA-TECDOC-1777, Vienna: IAEA, 2015.
CARLSON, C.S. Understanding and applying the fundamentals of FMEAs. In: ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2014, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
STAMATELATOS, M. Fault tree handbook with aerospace applications, version 1.1. Office of Safety and Mission Assurance. Washington: NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, USA, 2002a.
STAMATELATOS, M. Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners, version 1.1. Office of Safety and Mission Assurance. Washington: NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, USA, 2002b.
CALIXTO, E. Gas and oil reliability engineering. Modeling and analysis, Elsevier, Amsterdam: Netherlands, 2013.
USNRC - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method. NUREG/CR-6883, Washington: USNRC, 2005.
USNRC - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: guidance on uncertainty and use of experts, NUREG/CR-6372, Vols. 1 and 2, Washington: USNRC, 1997.
USNRC - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Evaluations of explosions postulated to occur at nearby facilities and on transportation routes near nuclear power plants, Regulatory Guide 1.91, Revision 2, Washington: USNRC, 2013.
USNRC - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Standard review plan for the review of safety analysis reports for nuclear power plants, LWR edition: design of structures, components, equipment, and systems. NUREG-0800, Chapter 3, Section 3.1.6 - Aircraft hazards, Washington: USNRC, 2010.
USNRC - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Standard review plan for the review of safety analysis reports for nuclear power plants, LWR edition: design of structures, components, equipment, and systems. NUREG-0800, Chapter 3, Section 3.5.1.3 – Turbine missiles, Washington: USNRC, 2007.
USNRC - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Evaluation of human reliability analysis methods against good practices, NUREG-1842, Washington: USNRC, 2006.
TOLENTINO, I.B. Desenvolvimento de um simulador dinâmico de análise de consequência para indústrias de processos. Tese de Doutorado (Engenharia Química) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas: UNICAMP, 2015.
KWAG, S.; GUPTA, A. Probabilistic risk assessment framework for structural systems under multiple hazards using Bayesian statistics. Nuclear Engineering and Design, v. 315, p. 20-34, 2017.
VASCONCELOS, V.; ANDRADE, M.C.; JORDÃO, E. Use of risk assessment methods for security design and analysis of nuclear and radioactive facilities, In: INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR ATLANTIC CONFERENCE, Belo Horizonte: Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear, 2011.
USNRC - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Feasibility study for a risk-informed and performance-based regulatory structure for future plant licensing, NUREG-1860, Vol. 1. Washington: USNRC, 2007.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/