A Simulation Model for Capacity Planning of Nuclear Fuel Plants for Research Reactors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v9i1.1588Keywords:
Keywords, Factories of nuclear fuel, Nuclear research reactors, Productive capacity management.Abstract
The demand for nuclear fuel for research reactors is increasing worldwide. However, some nuclear fuel factories have small production volumes. There is a gap in the literature regarding how to expand capacity of those facilities in a safe and reliable way. Thus, the purpose of this work is to propose and validate a conceptual model to increase the production capacity of these factories. We addressed factories that produce plate-type fuel elements loaded with LEU U3Si2-Al, which are typically used in nuclear research reactors. We collected data from a real nuclear fuel plant and applied the model to that data, i.e., we set up a case study. We developed two different strategies for the use of the model, thus generating several production scenarios. Each scenario is an experiment of the different possibilities to enlarge the capacity. We applied discrete events simulation in order to cover all production scenarios. Our tests indicated significant increases in productive capacity, thus showing that the model has fully achieved its proposed objective. One of the main conclusions that we point out is the model’s effectiveness. That effectiveness was demonstrated by using the model in two different strategies and obtaining increases in capacity with both of them.- Views: 183
- PDF Downloads: 197
Downloads
References
Sekimoto, H. Nuclear reactor theory. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2007.
Giraldo, J.S.; Gotham, D.J.; et al. Fundamentals of Nuclear Power. n. December, p. 1–67, 2012.
Wright, C.L.; Maly, J.J.; et al. Advancing Precision Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging for Lymphoma. PET Clinics, v. 12, n. 1, p. 63–82, 2016.
Almaz, E.; Stone, S.; et al. The effects of neutron irradiation and low temperature annealing on the electrical properties of highly doped 4H silicon carbide. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, v. 622, n. 1, p. 200–206, 2010.
Huseynov, E.M. Investigation of the agglomeration and amorphous transformation effects of neutron irradiation on the nanocrystalline silicon carbide (3C-SiC) using TEM and SEM methods. Physica B: Condensed Matter, v. 510, n. December 2016, p. 99–103, 2017.
Cheng, X.; Batta, A.; et al. European activities on crosscutting thermal-hydraulic phenomena for innovative nuclear systems. Nuclear Engineering and Design, v. 290, p. 2–12, 2015.
Zhang, H.; Cheng, H.; et al. Thirty meters small angle neutron scattering instrument at China advanced research reactor. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, v. 735, p. 490–495, 2014.
Hong, S.; Bradshaw, C.J.A.; et al. Nuclear power can reduce emissions and maintain a strong economy: Rating Australia’s optimal future electricity-generation mix by technologies and policies. Applied Energy, v. 136, p. 712–725, 2014.
Cerchione, R.; Esposito, E. A systematic review of supply chain knowledge management research: State of the art and research opportunities. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 182, p. 276–292, 2016.
Snelgrove, J.L.; Doraagala, R.F.; et al. THE USE OF U3Si2 DISPERSED IN ALUMINUM IN PLATE-TYPE FUEL ELEMENTS FOR RESEARCH AND TEST REACTORS. Argonne, IL: 1987.
Durazzo, M.; Riella, H.G. Procedures for Manufacturing Nuclear Research Reactor Fuel Elements. Saarbrücken, Germany: OmniScriptum GmbH & Co. KG, 2015.
Chandler, D. et al. Neutronic and thermal-hydraulic feasibility studies for High Flux Isotope Reactor conversion to low-enriched uranium silicide dispersion fuel. Annals of Nuclear Energy, v. 130, n. August 2019, p. 277–292, 2019.
Leray, O. et al. Neutronics qualification of the Jules Horowitz Reactor fuel by interpretation of the VALMONT experimental program — Transposition of the uncertainties on the reactivity of JHR with JEF2.2 and JEFF3.1.1. In: 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation, Measurement Methods and their Applications. Ghent, Belgium: 2011, p. 1–8.
Scannen, L. Scientific report. Mol, Belgium: 2004.
Saliba-Silva, A.M.; Carvalho, E.F.U. de; et al. Research Reactor Fuel Fabrication to Produce Radioisotopes. Radioisotopes-Applications in Physical Sciences: InTech, 2011.
Gan, J.; Keiser, D.D.; et al. Microstructure of the irradiated U3Si2/Al silicide dispersion fuel. Journal of Nuclear Materials, v. 419, n. 1–3, p. 97–104, 2011.
Negro, M.L.M.; Durazzo, M.; et al. Studies on Capacity Expansion of Fuel Plants for Nuclear Research Reactors. World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, v. 08, n. 02, p. 38–53, 2018.
Kim, Y.S.; Hofman, G.L.; et al. Temperature and dose dependence of fission-gas-bubble swelling in U3Si2. Journal of Nuclear Materials, v. 389, n. 3, p. 443–449, 2009.
Simnad, M.T. PERSPECTIVE ON RESEARCH REACTORS AND THEIR FUEL ELEMENTS. Journal of Nuclear Materials, v. 100, p. 78–92, 1981.
Choi, S.; Messinger, P.R. The role of fairness in competitive supply chain relationships: An experimental study. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 251, n. 3, p. 798–813, 2014.
Qin, F.; Mai, F.; et al. Supply-chain performance anomalies: Fairness concerns under private cost information. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 252, n. 1, p. 170–182, 2016.
Goldratt, E.M.; Cox, J. The goal. Great Barrington, MA: 2004.
Krajewski, L.J.; Malhotra, M.K.; et al. Operations Management: Processes and Supply Chains Plus. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall, 2015.
Balaman, Ş.Y. Investment planning and strategic management of sustainable systems for clean power generation: An ε-constraint based multi objective modelling approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 137, p. 1179–1190, 2016.
Zhu, Q.; Feng, Y.; et al. The role of customer relational governance in environmental and economic performance improvement through green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, p. 27, 2016.
Tseng, M.-L.; Lim, M.K.; et al. A framework for evaluating the performance of sustainable service supply chain management under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, n. 2012, 2016.
Brocke, J. Vom; Zelt, S.; et al. On the role of context in business process management. International Journal of Information Management, v. 36, n. 3, p. 486–495, 2016.
Diallo, S.; Mustafee, N. Towards an Encyclopedia of Modeling and Simulation Methodology. n. 2003, p. 2692–2703, 2015.
Baril, C.; Gascon, V.; et al. Use of a discrete-event simulation in a Kaizen event: A case study in healthcare. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 249, n. 1, p. 327–339, 2016.
Rockwell Automation (2015). Arena Simulation Software.
Dias, L.M.S., Pereira, G.A.B., Vik, P., & Oliveira, J.A. (2011). Discrete Simulation Tools Ranking. 6.
Silva, A.T.; Terremoto, L.A.A.; et al. Qualification program of research reactor fuels manufactured at IPEN e CNEN / SP. v. 50, p. 795–799, 2008.
Pruvost, N.L.; Paxton, H.C. Nuclear Criticality Safety Guide. Los Alamos, CA: 1996.
Woo, S.M.; Boo, H.; et al. Investigations on Detecting Potential Nuclear Material Diversion from a Pyroprocessing Facility Investigations on Detecting Potential Nuclear Material Diversion from a Pyroprocessing Facility. Nuclear Technology, v. 205, n. 3, p. 464–473, 2019.
Hodges, M.S.; Sanders, C.E. Nuclear criticality accident safety, near misses and classification. Elsevier Ltd, 2014.
Shugart, N.; King, J.; et al. Examining Fuel-Cycle Scenarios with
the Safeguards Analysis Toolbox Examining Fuel-Cycle Scenarios with the Safeguards Analysis Toolbox. Nuclear Technology, v. 204, n. 2, p. 147–161, 2018.
Pinedo, M.L. Scheduling. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2008.
PINEDO, M.L. Planning and Scheduling in Manufacture and Services. New York, NY: Springer, 2005.
Cerdas, F.; Kurle, D.; et al. ScienceDirect Defining Circulation Factories – A pathway towards Factories of the Future. Procedia CIRP, v. 29, p. 627–632, 2015.
Hedayat, A. Developing a practical optimization of the refueling program for ordinary research reactors using a modified simulated annealing method. Progress in Nuclear Energy, v. 76, p. 191–205, 2014.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
