The evolution of the nuclear emergency response plan using mechanisms of learning, innovation and communication

Authors

  • André Luiz Quadros CNEN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2022.1832

Keywords:

Organizational learning, Innovation, Innovation, Risk communication, Preparedness and response for a nuclear emergency, Integrated and systematic evolutionary model

Abstract

In a modern world, where technological development becomes part of their daily lives, human beings are either consciously or unconsciously submitted to a variety of risks. Considering that any industry generates some type of risk to man or the environment and that to face these risks, it is necessary to develop emergency response plans for those situations, which despite being considered of low probability of occurrence, such as in the thermonuclear electrical energy generation, when they occur, they can have a significant impact on its surroundings. In this sense, this work aimed to identify and analyze the dynamics of preparation and response to possible emergencies in a nuclear power plant, based on the evolutionary change of an emergency plan and, aiming to understand the evolution of these plans, in light of the organizational learning processes, innovation and risk communication. Therefore, the research adopted an exploratory character, seeking evidence in documents, in emergency response planning meetings and in a so-called General Nuclear Emergency Response Exercise, conducting interviews with stakeholders and applying a questionnaire to the population living in the surroundings of the facility. The work also presents a model that facilitates the understanding of the proposed approach and values the importance of participation and cooperation between the actors involved within a perspective with the effective participation of society, confirming, in addition, the importance of the three studied processes, demonstrating that they can be treated and evaluated in an integrated and systematic way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY - IAEA. Nuclear Power Reactors in the World. Vienna, 2020. (IAEA Reference Data Series No. 2). Disponível em: <https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/RDS-2-40_web.pdf>. Acesso em: 05 jan. 2022.

LATOUR, Bruno. Ciência em ação: como seguir cientistas e engenheiros sociedade afora. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2000.

NELSON, Richard R.; WINTER, Sidney G. In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy, v.6, n.1, p.36–76, 1977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(77)90029-4

FREEMAN, Chris; PEREZ, Carlota. Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles, and investment behavior. In: DOSI, G., FREEMAN, C., NELSON, R., SILVERBERG, G., SOETE, L. (Ed.), Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter, 1988, p. 38-66.

FREEMAN, Chris. The economics of technical change. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v.18, p.463-514, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035286

NEMET, Gregory F. Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy, v.38, p.700–709, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.004

PAVITT, Keith. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, v.13, p. 343-373, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0

ROSENBERG, Nathan. Por dentro da caixa preta: tecnologia e economia. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp, 2006. (Tradução de: Inside the Black Box - Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).

COHEN, W. M.; LEVINTHAL, D. A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation. v. 35, n.1, p. 128-152, mar. 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

QUADROS, André. L. L. Aprendizagem, Inovação e Comunicação: A Dinâmica Evolutiva de um Plano de Emergência Nuclear. 2014. 271p. Tese (Doutorado) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Escola de Comunicação; Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, 2014. Disponível em: <https://ridi.ibict.br/handle/123456789/787>. Acesso em 13 mar. 2020.

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY - IAEA. General Safety Requirements No. GSR Part 7, Preparedness and response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, IAEA, Vienna 2015.

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY - IAEA. General Safety Guide No. GS-G-2.1, Arrangements for Preparedness for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, IAEA, Vienna 2007.

LEVINTHAL, Daniel. Learning and schumpeterian dynamics. In: DOSI, G.; MALERBA, F. (Ed.). Organization and strategy in the evolution of the enterprise. Londres: Macmillan, 1996, p. 27-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13389-5_2

VEYRET, Yvette. Os riscos: o homem como agressor e vítima do meio ambiente. São Paulo: Contexto, 2007.

NELSON, Richard R.; WINTER. Evolutionary theorizing in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives. v. 16, n. 2, p. 23-46, Spring 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330027247

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY - IAEA. Leadership, Human Performance and Internal Communication in Nuclear Emergencies, IAEA, Vienna 2018.

GIDDENS, Anthony. As consequências da modernidade. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade Estadual Paulista, 1991.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-29

How to Cite

Quadros, A. L. (2022). The evolution of the nuclear emergency response plan using mechanisms of learning, innovation and communication. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, 10(3A (Suppl.). https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2022.1832

Issue

Section

INAC 2021_XXII ENFIR_VII_ENIN