Dose reduction evaluation in radiosensitive tissues for head CT scans using two phantoms and bismuth eye shielding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v10i3.2040Keywords:
Computed tomography, bismuth eye shielding, dosimetry, radiochromic filmAbstract
Computed tomography is the imaging technique that most contributes to increasing the population average dose. Head scanning protocols have a very high dose in patients due to the small thicknesses of the slice for 3D image reconstruction. In this sense, radiosensitive tissues, such as the eye lenses and the thyroid, receive significant doses, as they are close to or in the irradiated field. The objective of this work is to present data on the variation of absorbed dose in the eye lenses and thyroid, with and without the use of bismuth eye shielding in head CT scans, and also to analyze the best dose-to-noise ratio in order to observe whether there is a decrease in image quality capable of rendering the proposed protocols useless. The method is based on head scans testing optimized protocols for the radiology service. Two male phantoms, one anthropomorphic and the other made in polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), were used in the tests and radiochromic films were used to measure the absorbed dose values. The films were placed in the eye lenses and thyroid regions. Scans were performed on a GE CT scanner with 64-channel, Light Speed model. The obtained data allowed to observe the dose variation in the tissues and to conclude which of used protocols presented has the best noise-to-dose ratio for the use of the bismuth eye shielding. The results obtained will be important to suggest a complementary procedure for the optimization of head CT scans.
- Views: 229
- PDF Downloads: 187
- XML Downloads: 20
Downloads
References
Thurston, Jim. NCRP Report No. 160: ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/20/6327
ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103 (2007). Ann. ICRP, Volume 37, p. 1-332.
CHODICK, G. et al. Risk of cataract after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation: a 20-year prospective cohort study among US radiologic technologists. American journal of epidemiology, v. 168, n. 6, p. 620-631, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn171
YUAN, Mei-Kang et al. The risk of cataract associated with repeated head and neck CT studies: a nationwide population-based study. American Journal of Roentgenology, v. 201, n. 3, p. 626-630, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9652
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Guidance on Radiation Dose Limits for the Lens of the Eye, NCRP Commentary No. 26. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland, 2016.
SCHONFELD, S. J.; LEE, C.; DE GONZALEZ, A. B.. Medical exposure to radiation and thyroid cancer. Clinical Oncology, v. 23, n. 4, p. 244-250, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2011.01.159
Baker, Stephen R.; BHATTI, Waseem A. The thyroid cancer epidemic: is it the dark side of the CT revolution?. European journal of radiology, v. 60, n. 1, p. 67-69, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.04.022
TIPNIS, S. V. et al. Thyroid doses and risks to adult patients undergoing neck CT examinations. American Journal of Roentgenology, v. 204, n. 5, p. 1064-1068, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13102
CIARMATORI, A. et al. Reducing absorbed dose to eye lenses in head CT examinations: the effect of bismuth shielding. Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine, v. 39, n. 2, p. 583-589, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-016-0445-y
OMER, Hiba et al. Eye lens and thyroid gland radiation exposure for patients undergoing brain computed tomography examination. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, v. 28, n. 1, p. 342-346, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.10.010
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiation and cataract: staff protection. Available at: <https://www.iaea.org/resources/rpop/health-professionals/radiology/cataract/patients> Last accessed: 19 Nov. 2020.
LIN, Ming-Fang et al. Topogram-based tube current modulation of head computed tomography for optimizing image quality while protecting the eye lens with shielding. Acta Radiologica, v. 60, n. 1, p. 61-67, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185118770894
LEE, Jong-Woong; KWEON, Dae Cheol. Assessment of dose reduction and image quality by barium composite shielding in head and chest CT. Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids, p. 1-18, 2020.
BANGASSI, T. N. K.; SAMBA, O. N.; THIERENS, H.; BACHER, K. Eye Lens Dose Reduction in Head CT Using Bismuth Shielding: Application in CT Facility in Cameroon. AASCIT Journal of Health, vol.5,nº1. pg 11-15, 2018.
Radiopaedia. Beam hardening. Available at: <https://radiopaedia.org/articles/beam-hardening> Last accessed: 19 Nov. 2020.
LAI, C. W. K. et al. Reducing the radiation dose to the eye lens region during CT brain examination: the potential beneficial effect of the combined use of bolus and a bismuth shield. Radioprotection, v. 50, n. 3, p. 195-201, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2015003
SALINAS, C. Leiva et al. Bismuth shielding at head CT: Impact of a novel design on the image quality and dose reduction to the lens. ECR 2015, 2015.
GIADDUI, T. et al. Characteristics of Gafchromic XRQA2 films for kV image dose measurement. Medical physics, v. 39, n. 2, p. 842-850, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3675398
BioSmith. Eye shield. Available at: < https://www.fandlmedicalproducts.com/AttenuRad-CT-Eye-Shield.html > Last accessed: 19 Jan. 2021.
RASBAND, W. S. ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 2011. Available at: <http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/>. Last accessed: 19 Nov. 2020.
MOURÃO, A. P.; ALONSO, T. C.; DASILVA, T. A. Dose profile variation with voltage in head CT scans using radiochromic films. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, v. 95, p. 254-257, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.05.013
RAMPADO, O.; GARELLI, E.; ROPOLO, R. Computed tomography dose measurements with radiochromic films and a flatbed scanner. Medical physics, v. 37, n. 1, p. 189-196, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3271584
RadiAnt DICOM Viewer. Available at: <https://www.radiantviewer.com/dicom-viewer-manual/>. Last accessed: 19 Nov. 2020.
MOURÃO, Arnaldo Prata. Tomografia computadorizada: tecnologias e aplicações. Difusão Editora, 2018.
NIST—National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available at: < https://www.nist.gov/national-institute-standards-and-technology > Last accessed: 19 Jan. 2020.
DALMAZO, J. et al. Radiation dose optimization in routine computed tomography: a study of feasibility in a University Hospital. Radiologia Brasileira, v. 43, p. 241-248, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842010000400008
American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AAPM position statement on the use of bismuth shielding for the purpose of dose reduction in CT scanning. AAPM website., 2012. Available at: <https://www.aapm.org/publicgeneral/bismuthshielding.pdf>. Last accessed: 19 Nov. 2020.
HAMADA, Nobuyuki. Ionizing radiation sensitivity of the ocular lens and its dose rate dependence. International Journal of Radiation Biology, v. 93, n. 10, p. 1024-1034, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2016.1266407
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
