Dose sensitivity of MAGIC-f polymer gel using different MRI sequences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2022.2085Keywords:
dosimetric gel, MAGIC-f, 3D Dosimetry, magnetic resonance, spin echoAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the dose sensitivity of MAGIC-f gel irradiated by high-energy photon beams, comparing quantification using different MRI sequences. Irradiation was performed using 6 MV photons with 600 cGy/min dose rate, field size of 20x20 cm², and 94 cm source-to-surface distance. Two gel batches were produced on different days and placed in vials. In the first batch, doses of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, and 40 Gy were planned. The second batch was irradiated with doses of 0, 2, 4, 6, 10, 12, 14, and 16 Gy. MR images were acquired with Spin Echo (SE, TR=3 s) and Multi Spin Echo (MSE, TR = 3s or 10s, turbo factor 24) sequences. The dose is assessed via changes in the transverse relaxation time in the irradiated gel. In MSE, dose sensitivity in the first batch was 0.27 (TR=3 s) and 0.28 Gy-1s-1 (TR=10 s) and in the second batch, 0.31 and 0.31 Gy-1s-1 (TR = 3 s and TR = 10 s, respectively). In the SE sequence, dose sensitivity was 0.42 for the first batch and 0.43 Gy-1s-1 for the second batch. Linearity of dose-response was only obtained for doses below 10 Gy. Comparing the dose sensitivity extracted from MSE and SE sequences using TR= 3s, differences around 30% were found. Thus, although MSE-MRI offers a faster protocol of imaging acquisition it is less precise for quantification of relaxation times, as TE is not a well-defined quantity. The performance of the gel as a dosimeter is consequently sequence dependent.
- Views: 200
- PDF Downloads: 164
- XML Downloads: 32
Downloads
References
Baldock C, De Deene Y, Doran S, Ibbott G, Jirasek A, Lepage M, et al. Polymer gel dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/5/R01
Silveira MA, Pavoni JF, Baffa O. Three-dimensional quality assurance of IMRT prostate plans using gel dosimetry. Phys Medica [Internet]. 2017;34:1–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.007
Pavoni JF, Pastorello BF, De Arajo DB, Baff. Formaldehyde increases MAGIC gel dosimeter melting point and sensitivity. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/4/N04
Mather ML, Whittaker AK, Baldock C. Ultrasound evaluation of polymer gel dosimeters. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47(9):1449–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/9/302
Jirasek A, Hilts M. An overview of polymer gel dosimetry using x-ray CT. J Phys Conf Ser. 2009;164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/164/1/012038
De Deene Y. How to scan polymer gels with MRI? J Phys Conf Ser. 2010;250:69–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/250/1/012015
SCHWARCKE MMB. Caracterização do Gel Polimérico MAGIC-f para Aplicação em Medicina Nuclear Utilizando Imagens de Ressonância Magnética. 2013.
Pavoni JF, Baffa O. An evaluation of dosimetric characteristics of MAGIC gel modified by adding formaldehyde (MAGIC-f). Radiat Meas. 2012;47(11–12):1074–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.10.004
Khan M, Heilemann G, Kuess P, Georg D, Berg A. The impact of the oxygen scavenger on the dose-rate dependence and dose sensitivity of MAGIC type polymer gels. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aab00b
Khan M, Heilemann G, Berg AG, Lechner W, Georg D. Basic Properties of a New Polymer Gel for 3D-Dosimetry at High Dose-Rates Typical for FFF Irradiation Based on. Polymers (Basel). 2019;11:E1717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101717
Lizar JC, Volpato KC, Brandão FC, da Silva Guimarães F, Arruda GV, Pavoni JF. Tridimensional dose evaluation of the respiratory motion influence on breast radiotherapy treatments using conformal radiotherapy, forward IMRT, and inverse IMRT planning techniques. Phys Medica. 2021;81(November 2020):60–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.11.036
Maraghechi B, Gach HM, Setianegara J, Yang D, Li HH. Dose uncertainty and resolution of polymer gel dosimetry using an MRI guided radiation therapy system’s onboard 0.35 T scanner. Phys Medica [Internet]. 2020;73(March):8–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.004
Acurio ESR, Lizar JC, Arruda GV, Pavoni JF. Technical Note: Three-dimensional QA of simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatments by a dose-volume histogram methodology and its comparison with 3D gamma results. Med Phys. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14859
Pavoni JF, Neves-Junior WFP, Da Silveira MA, Haddad CMK, Baffa O. Evaluation of a composite Gel-Alanine phantom on an end-to-end test to treat multiple brain metastases by a single isocenter VMAT technique. Med Phys. 2017;44(9):4869–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12400
Resende TD. Um estudo para otimização da formulação do dosímetro gel MAGIC- f e avaliação da sua reutilização Sumário. Universidade de São Paulo; 2017.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
