New Deformity Outline on the Breast Radiation Therapy for diminishing Absorbed Dose Ratio

Abdollah Khorshidi; Mansour Ashoor

doi:10.15392/2319-0612.2023.2281

Authors

Abdollah Khorshidi Radiation Application Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute
Mansour Ashoor Radiation Application Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2023.2281

Keywords:

Positron radiation, Breast cancer, Deformity, Absorbed Dose ratio

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant diseases in women. After tumor mass surgery, radiation therapy is regularly taken into account the gold standard for the treatment. Kilo to Mega voltage photons have been suggested due to their characteristic depth dose build-up regime, reducing the dose to the breast skin to a fraction of the maximum dose exposure. During treatment, mean glandular dose is commonly used as a criterion for identifying radiation risks. Here, two outlines in cubic-rectangular (CR) and cylindrical- taper (CT) outlines were modelled together with corresponding assumptions using Monte-Carlo simulation and the recorded absorbed dose ratio (ADR) values were compared via defined a positron source by 511 keV energy. The results showed that the amounts of absorption and scattering cross-sections next to the ADR amount decreased as the height of the CR outline decreased. The average dose ratio amount in the CR outline was reduced by about 96% compared to that in the CT outline. By increasing the positron source distance from the nipple, the ADR amounts decreased for both outlines. The amount of accumulated dose ratio decreased harshly in the CR outline rather than in the CT outline. This study can be useful to examine breast tissue deformity in treatment planning.

Views: 194
PDF Downloads: 171
XML Downloads: 9

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Joe, B. N.; Lee, A. Y. Breast Imaging, E-Book: The Core Requisites. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2022.

Gershenson, D. M.; Lentz, G. M.; Valea, F. A.; Lobo, R. A. Comprehensive Gynecology. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2021.

Winters, S.; Martin, C.; Murphy, D.; Shokar. N. K. Breast Cancer Epidemiology, Prevention, and Screening. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, v. 151, p. 1-32, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.07.002

Feng, Y. et al. Breast cancer development and progression: Risk factors, cancer stem cells, signaling pathways, genomics, and molecular pathogenesis. Genes & Diseases, v. 5, p. 77-106, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2018.05.001

Oscar, A.; Villarreal, M.; Velasco, F. G.; Fausto, A. M. F.; Mas Milian, F.; Mol, A. W.; Capizzi, K. R.; Ambrosio, P. Optimization of the exposure parameters in digital mammography for diverse glandularities using the contrast-detail metric. Physica Medica, v. 101, p. 112-119, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.08.009

Fitton, I.; Noël, A.; Minassian, J.; Zerhouni, M.; Wojak, J.; Adel, M.; Fournier, L. Technical note: Design and initial evaluation of a novel physical breast phantom to monitor image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis. Medical Physics, v. 49, p. 2355-2365, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15498

Maqsood, S.; Damaševičius, R.; Maskeliūnas, R. TTCNN: A Breast Cancer Detection and Classification towards Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using Digital Mammography in Early Stages. Applied Sciences, v. 12, p. 3273, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073273

Altameem, A.; Mahanty, C.; Poonia, R. C.; Saudagar, A. K. J.; Kumar, R. Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks and Fuzzy Ensemble Modeling Techniques. Diagnostics, 12, p. 1812, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081812

Balleyguier, C.; Cousin, M.; Dunant, A.; Attard, M.; Delaloge, S.; Arfi-Rouche, J. Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography. European Journal of Cancer, v. 103, p. 137-142, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.08.009

Pelowitz, D. B. editor. MCNPX user's manual version 2.6.0, LA-CP-07-1473. New Mexico, United States: Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), 2008.

Authors on behalf of ICRP, Eckerman, K.; Harrison, J.; Menzel H. G.; Clement C. H. ICRP Publication 119: Compendium of Dose Coefficients based on ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP, v. 42, p. e1-e130, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2013.05.003

Evaluated Nuclear Data File; 2009. Available at: https://www-nds.iaea.org/public/download-endf/ENDF-B-VII.0/. Last accessed: 2009 -01-18.

Velden, B. H. M.; Vos, B. D.; Loo, C. E.; Kuijf, H. J.; Isgum, I.; Gilhuijs, K. G. A. Response monitoring of breast cancer on DCE-MRI using convolutional neural network-generated seed points and constrained volume growing. Proc SPIE 10950, Medical Imaging 2019: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 109500D, 13 March 2019. doi: 10.1117/12.2508358

Buonanno, F.; Sarno, A.; De Lucia, P. A.; Di Lillo, F.; Masi, M.; Di Franco, F.; Mettivier, G.; Russo, P. Rotational radiotherapy of breast cancer with polyenergetic kilovoltage X-ray beams: An experimental and Monte Carlo phantom study. Physica Medica, v. 62, p. 63-72, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.05.002

Svahn, T. M.; Houssami, N.; Sechopoulos, I.; Mattsson, S. Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography. Breast, v. 24, p. 93-9, 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.12.002

Maajani, K.; Jalali, A.; Alipour, S.; Khodadost, M.; Tohidinik, H. R.; Yazdani, K. The Global and Regional Survival Rate of Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Breast Cancer, v. 19, p. 165-177, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.01.006

Nakamura, T.; Suzuki, S.; Takei, Y.; Kobayashi, I.; Pongnapang, N.; Kato, K. Simultaneous measurement of patient dose and distribution of indoor scattered radiation during digital breast tomosynthesis. Radiography, v. 25, p. 72-76, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2018.10.006

Choi, J. S.; Rim, C. H.; Kim, Y. B.; Yang, D. S. Cumulative radiation exposure dose of diagnostic imaging studies in breast cancer patients. Inte J Radiat Res, v. 17, p. 275-281, 2019. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.17.2.275

Khorshidi, A. Accelerator driven neutron source design via beryllium target and 208Pb modera-tor for boron neutron capture therapy in alternative treatment strategy by Monte Carlo method. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, v. 13, p. 456-465, 2017. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.179180.

Khorshidi, A. Nano Yttrium-90 and Rhenium-188 production through medium medical cyclo-tron and research reactor for therapeutic usages: A Simulation study. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, v. 55, p. 1871-1877, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2023.02.013

Khorshidi, A. Segmentation of tumor region in respiratory disease by extended algorithm. In-ternational Journal of Modern Physics C, 2023; In Press. doi: 10.1142/S0129183123501644

Khorshidi, A. Assessment of SPECT images using UHRFB and other low-energy collimators in brain study by Hoffman phantom and manufactured defects. The European Physical Journal Plus, v. 135, p. 261, 2020. doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00238-6

Souza, G. C. de A.; Gontijo, R. M. G.; Silva, J. B. da; Mamede, M.; Ferreira, A. V. Spatial re-solution of a preclinical PET tomograph. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, v. 9(1A), 2021. https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v9i1A.1503

Bispo, A. C. de A.; Nascimento, L. T. C. do; Castro, A. C. F.; Lima, L. A. R.; Ferreira, S. M. Z. M. D.; Silva, J. B. da; Mamede, M. Synthesis and characterization of the radiopharmaceutical [18F]fluoroestradiol. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, v. 9(1A), 2021. https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v9i1A.1387

Paiva, F. G.; Santana, P. C.; Mourão Filho, A. P. Patient dose reduction by changing the amount of 18F-FDG radiopharmaceutical injected. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, v. 7(2A (Suppl.), 2019. https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v7i2A.704

Pessanha, P. R.; de Queiroz Filho, P. P.; Santos, D. de S. Dosimetric evaluation of extremities in 18F-FDG PET/CT procedure using Monte Carlo Geant4 code. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, v. 7(3B (Suppl.), 2019. https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v7i3B.890

Santana de Souza, S. A.; Monteiro Rodrigues, F.; Fattori Alves, A. F.; Alvarez, M.; Molena Seraphim, D.; Lopes Ruiz Junior, R.; Souza Trindade Filho, J. C.; Marrone Ribeiro, S.; Pina, D. R. Quality and Quantity Assessment of Tomographic Exams That Can Be Performed on Existing Hybrid Equipment at Botucatu Medical School Nuclear Medicine Services. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, v. 10(2), 2022. https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v10i2.1799.