Analysis of the setup deviations generated in the 6D ExacTrac X-ray system for patients in hypofractionated intracranial radiosurgery treatments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v7i1.793Keywords:
intracranial radiosurgery, IGRT, ExacTrac X-Ray system, PTV marginsAbstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of the pre-treatment daily imaging system with the Brainlab ExacTrac X-Ray 6D for patients in hypofractionated intracranial treatments and radiosurgery procedures in order to quantify setups errors and review margins used by the institution in the current planning protocol. The deviations generated in the translational and rotational coordinates were given in terms of the mean values and their respective standard deviations. The random and systematic errors were determined through the Stroom and Wang relation and 36 patients treated with intracranial hypofractionated radiosurgery from August 2015 to October 2016 were evaluated. The prescribed dose was 25-30 Gy in 5 fractions for 30 patients and 12-18 Gy in a single fraction for 6 patients. The calculated margin for the planning target volume (PTV) from the deviations analyzed was 1.3mm, consistent with that adopted by the institution. When the correlation between the volume of the PTV, vector and its respective loss of coverage is evaluated and a tendency can be observed for smaller volumes to suffer greater losses in coverage when the isocenters were displaced with the resulting margins. We can suggest that for volumes smaller than 2.6 cm3, margins greater than 1 mm are required in order to guarantee the expected coverage of the PTV.
- Views: 137
- PDF Downloads: 141
Downloads
References
ICRU - International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy (Supplement to ICRU Report 51). ICRU Report 62, Bethesda: ICRU, 1999. 47p.
NCS - Netherlands Commission on Radiation Dosimetry. Process Management and Quality Assurance for Intracranial Stereotactic Treatment. Report 25, Netherlands Commission on Radiation Dosimetry. October 2015. 141p.
HERK V. M., Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007;17:258–67.
DING GX, DUGGAN DM, COFFEY CW, et al. A study on adaptive IMRT treatment planning using kV cone-beam CT. Radiother Oncol. 2007;85:116–125.
PAWLOWSKI JM, YANG ES, MALCOLM AW, COFFEY CW, DING GX. Reduction of dose delivered to organs at risk in prostate cancer patients via image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:924–934.
JIN JY, YIN FF, TENN SE, MEDIN PM, SOLBERG TD. Use of the BrainLAB ExacTrac X-Ray 6D system in image-guided radiotherapy. Med Dosim.2008 Summer; 33(2):124-34.
GEVAERT T.; VERELLEN D.; ENGELS B.; DEPUYDT T.; HEUNINCKX K.; TOURNEL K.; DUCHATEAU M.; REYNDERS T.; RIDDER M. IGRT - Clinical Evaluation of a Robotic 6-Degree of Freedom Treatment Couch for Frameless Radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(1): 467-74.
VERBAKEL WF, LAGERWAARD FJ, VERDUIN AJ, HEUKELOM S, SLOTMAN BJ, CUIJPERS JP.The accuracy of frameless
stereotactic intracranial radiosurgery. Radiotherapy and Oncology 97 (2010) 390–394.
JIN J., RYU S., ROCK J., FABER K., GATES M., LI S., MOVSAS B. Image-Guided Target Localization for Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Accuracy of 6D versus 3D Image Fusion. Basel Karger, v. 6, p. 50-59, 2006.
ICRU - International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Intensity-Modulated Photon-Beam Therapy (IMRT). ICRU Report 83, 2010. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/ndq002, Last accessed: August 2018.
BALTER JM, CHEN GTY, PELIZZARI CA, et al. On-line repositioning during treatment of the prostate: A study of potential limits and gains. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;27:137–143.
HERK V. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol., v.14 p.52-64, 2004.
INFUSINO E, TRODELLA L, RAMELLA S, D'ANGELILLO R, GRECO C, IURATO A, E. TRODELLA L, NACCA A, CORNACCHIONE P AND MAMELI A. Estimation of patient setup uncertainty using BrainLAB Exatrac X-Ray 6D system in image-guided radiotherapy. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, v. 16; 2015.
STROOM J. C., HEIJMEN B. J. M. Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report. Radiotherapy and Oncology, v.64; 2002.
Wang H1, Wang C1, Tung S1, Dimmitt AW2, Wong PF1, Edson MA2, Garden AS2, Rosenthal DI2, Fuller CD2, Gunn GB2, Takiar V2, Wang XA1, Luo D1,Yang JN1, Wong J1, Phan J2. Improved setup and positioning accuracy using a three-point customized cushion/mask/bite-block immobilization system for stereotactic reirradiation of head and neck cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. V16; 2016.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
