Control blade history reactivity and pin power effects evaluated with Westinghouse BWR nodal core simulator POLCA8

Authors

  • Petri Forslund Guimaraes Westinghouse Electric Sweden AB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v7i3A.841

Keywords:

BWR nodal core analysis, control blade history, nodal cross section models, pin power reconstruction.

Abstract

The so-called “Control Blade History” (CBH) effect has always posed a serious challenge for any nodal core simulator in performing Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) core analyses. In this paper a method to handle such CBH effects is proposed based on the idea of interpolating lattice physics data between two extreme cases with regard to CBH, namely, the case with the control rod always inserted during depletion and the case with the control rod never inserted during fuel irradiation. In POLCA8, the latest upgrade of the Westinghouse BWR nodal core simulator POLCA, one applies the methodology to macroscopic cross sections, discontinuity factors, pin powers and detector constants. Overall, the proposed CBH model performs very well in terms of predictive accuracy of reactivity and pin powers although simultaneous presence of control rods (CRs) and burnable absorbers (BAs) still poses a challenge due to some observed interference of their impact on reactivity. Applying the CBH model for pin power reconstruction is particularly promising and provides excellent prediction accuracy in the vicinity of the CR and at the point of CR withdrawal being the most challenging and critical condition with regard to CBH.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Petri Forslund Guimaraes, Westinghouse Electric Sweden AB

Principal Engineer

BWR Core Physics Methods and Licensing

Sweden Fuel Engineering

 

References

IWAMOTO, T.; YAMAMOTO, M. Advanced Nodal Methods of the Few-Group BWR Core Simulator NEREUS. Journal of Nucl. Sci. and Tech., v. 36, no. 11, p. 996-1008, 1999.

IWAMOTO, T.; YAMAMOTO, M. Pin Power Reconstruction Methods of the Few-Group BWR Core Simulator NEREUS. Journal of Nucl. Sci. and Tech., v. 36, no. 12, p. 1141-1152, 1999.

MOON, H. Advanced Core Design Using MICROBURN-B2 BWR Core Simulator. Proc. Am. Nucl. Soc. Topl. Mtg. Advances in Nuclear Fuel Management II, 1997, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA.

FORSLUND, P.; MÜLLER, E.; LINDAHL, S-Ö. Investigation of intranodal depletion effects. Ann. Nucl. Energy, v. 28, p. 225-250, 2001.

BAHADIR, T.; LINDAHL, S-Ö. Evaluation of Rodded BWR Assembly Pin Powers with SIMULATE5. Proc. Int. Conf. Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR 2012), 2012, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.

HØJERUP, C. F.; NONBØL, E. A Method of Taking Control Rod History into Account in Core Simulation Calculations for BWR’s. Proc. Int. Conf. Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR 1990), 1990, Marseille, France.

LIPIEC, W.; FORSLUND GUIMARÃES, P.; JOHANNESSON, S-B.; CASAL, J. Westinghouse BWR Core Analysis Methods Update. Proc. Int. Conf. TopFuel 2015, 2015, Zürich, Switzerland.

LINDAHL, S-Ö.; MÜLLER, E. Z. Status of ABB Atom’s Core Simulator POLCA. Proc. Int. Conf. Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR 1996), 1996, Mito, Japan.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-14

How to Cite

Guimaraes, P. F. (2019). Control blade history reactivity and pin power effects evaluated with Westinghouse BWR nodal core simulator POLCA8. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, 7(3A (Suppl.). https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v7i3A.841

Issue

Section

Week of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Sciences