Comparação entre métodos de medição da camada semi-redutora em radiologia

Authors

  • Denyel Jefferson Prado Faria Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva
  • Rafael Figueiredo Pohlmann Simões Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva
  • Fernando Mecca Augusto Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva
  • Leonardo Vieira Travassos Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva
  • Beneth Costa Gomes Pró-Sigma Serviços de Proteção Radiológica e Física Médica

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v8i3B.1613

Keywords:

Half Value Layer, Aluminum Slabs, Manual Measurement, Automatic Measurement

Abstract

The Half Value Layer (HVL) is a parameter used in Quality Control (QC), to evaluate the X-ray beam quality. The HVL can be measured through the X-ray primary beam attenuation measurement using knew thickness slabs of 99% purity aluminum (M1) or by adjusting the best curve (M2) or by multipurpose dosimeter (solid state detector) (M3). The M1 wears out the X-ray tube more and requires a long time of data acquisition and processing, however, it is the standard recommended method for the Radiological Safety Manual. The last one method (M3) is practical, and is not influenced by the abrupt change in the X-ray transmission spectrum, as it does not require the use of aluminum plates. The equipment used to measure radiation was the NOMEX dosemeter, Cobia Smart, UNFORS XI and Radcal Ionization Chamber. The sources were mobile and fixed X-rays and mammography equipment. The results showed that the biggest difference was 15.6% between M1 and M3 for mammography equipment with a filter\target W\Rh. For conventional X-rays, that the target-filter combination is W\Al, the biggest difference was 3.3% between M1 and M3. Thus, the results show that the HVL estimate can be performed by any of the three methods or equipment, as long as the target\filter combination is W/Al. For filter\target combination other than W/Al the percentage differences increase considerably and we do not recommend the use of M1 for this type of measurement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

MCKETTY, M. H. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. X-ray attenuation. Radiogr. Rev. Publ. Radiol. Soc. N. Am. Inc 18, p. 151–63; quiz 149. 1998.

BUSHBERG, Jerrold T.; BOONE, John M. The essential physics of medical imaging.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.

BUSHONG, Stewart C. Radiologic science for technologists-E-book: physics, biology, and protection. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2013.

ONUSIC, D. M., MOURA, S. P., CÔRTE, R. E. F., ALEXANDRE, A. C. and MÜHLEN, S. S. Um novo dispositivo eletrônico para medição de camada semi-redutora em feixes de raios X diagnósticos por exposição única. Rev Bras Eng Biomed. 23, p. 45 - 52. 2007.

IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency. Quality assurance programme for digital mammography. IAEA N°17, Vienna, Austria. 2011.

T. ULREY, C. An Experimental Investigation of the Energy in the Continuous X-Ray Spectra Of Certain Elements. vol 11. 1918.

PTW USER MANUAL. User Manual: NOMEX Multimeter T11049 Firmware Version 1.1 or higher. 2012.

RTI MANUAL BARRACUDA. Reference Manual: Barracuda & QABrowser. 2012

RTI ELECTRONICS AB. Cobia: Reference Manual. USA. 2015.

RTI ELECTRONICS AB. Application Note: Measurements of Total Filtration and kV with the Barracuda and the Piranha. 2007.

RTI APPLICATION NOTE: AN-033, W. H. Application Note: AN-033. Quick HVL

versus Traditional HVL measurement with Piranha. 2013.

TROUT, E., KELLEY, J. and FURNO, E. A study of the inherent filtration of diagnostic x-ray tubes. Radiology 66, p. 102–102. 1956.Faria et al. ● Braz. J. Rad. Sci. ● 2020

NAGEL, H. D. Limitations in the determination of total filtration of X-ray tube assemblies. Phys. Med. Biol. 33, p. 271–289. 1988.

LACERDA, A. H. de, Marco Aurélio de Sousa, Silva, Teógenes Augusto da, Oliveira. Influência da metodologia de avaliação da camada semi-redutora em radiologia diagnóstica. Radiol. Bras. 40, p. 331–6. 2007.

RTI ELECTRONICS AB. Application Note: Conversion tables between HVL and total filtration. 2010.

ANVISA - Agencia Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Radiodiagnóstico Médico:

Desempenho de Equipamentos e Segurança. ANVISA, Brasília, Brasil. 2005.

PERRY, N., BROEDERS, M., DE WOLF, C., TÖRNBERG, S., HOLLAND, R. and VONKARSA, L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. European Comission, Luxembourg. 2006

AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Equipment requirements and quality control for mammography. AAPM report n. 29. 1990.

WAGNER, L. K., ARCHER, B. R. and CERRA, F. On the measurement of half-value layer in film–screen mammography. Med. Phys. 17, p. 989–97. 1990

AAPM – American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Quality control in diagnostic radiology. Medical Physics Publishing, AAPM report n° 74, USA. 2002.

SVPRR - Sociedad Valenciana de Protección Radiológica y Radiofísica. Manual de procedimientos de control de calidad en radiodiagnóstico. Generalitat Valenciana, SVPRR. Valencia. 2002.

IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency. Control de Calidad en Mamografía. IAEA-TECDOC-1517. 2006.

SEFM-SEPR-SERAM - Servicio de Física Médica - Servicio de Protección Radiológica - Sociedad Española de Radiologia Médica. Protocolo español de control de calidad en radiodiagnóstico. SEFM-SEPR-SERAM. Senda Editorial, Madrid. 2012.

TAUHATA, L., SALATI, I., PRINZIO, R. D. AND PRINZIO, A. R. D. Radioproteção e dosimetria: fundamentos. Instituto De Radioproteção E Dosimetria E Comissão Nacional De Energia Nuclear – IRD E CNEN. Rio de Janeiro. 2014.

BIPM; IEC; IFCC; ILAC; ISSO; IUPAC; IUPAP; OIML - GUM 2008. Avaliação de dados de medição – Guia para a expressão de incerteza de medição. JCGM 100: 2008. 1a ed. Setembro/2008.

RADCAL CORPORATION. Model 2026C Radiation Monitor Controller Manual. 2000.

Published

2021-03-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Comparação entre métodos de medição da camada semi-redutora em radiologia. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, v. 8, n. 3B (Suppl.), 2021. DOI: 10.15392/bjrs.v8i3B.1613. Disponível em: https://bjrs.org.br/revista/index.php/REVISTA/article/view/1613.. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.

Similar Articles

51-60 of 218

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.