Groundwater vulnerability and radioecological hazard assessment in a semiarid watershed within the context of uranium mining in Caetité, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2026.3109Palabras clave:
groundwater vulnerability, DRASTIC, uranium mining, radioecological hazard, semiarid hydrogeologyResumen
In arid and semiarid watersheds, groundwater is the most reliable source of water all year-round, being used for domestic, agricultural, and industrial purposes. In such a context, conflicts over groundwater quality and/or supply are not rare. The lack of communication tools between the stakeholders hinders conflict resolution. A categorical example of such areas can be found at the Caetité Experimental Basin (CEB), where, from time to time, conflicts between stakeholders and the Uranium Production Unit (URA) take place. The CEB is a headwater, semiarid, ephemeral, hard-rock watershed, and groundwater vulnerability and radioecological hazard studies in this area are rare and outdated. Therefore, the present work aimed to map groundwater vulnerability and radioecological hazards posed by the URA to the CEB groundwater system through three index-based methodologies: the standard DRASTIC model, a locally-adapted DRASTIC-URA, and the Radioecological Hazard Index (RHI). Although most of the CEB presents low intrinsic groundwater vulnerability, the areas under the source terms are not equally vulnerable, and the most hazardous source term, from the point of view of radioecological impacts, is close to a highly vulnerable area. Such maps and indexes may be proven useful as a screening and communicative tool, since they illustrate the groundwater vulnerability distribution at CEB, as well as provide a way to compare it to other areas around the world.
Descargas
Referencias
[1] SENENT-APARICIO, J. et al. Evaluating Groundwater Management Sustainability under Limited Data Availability in Semiarid Zones. Water, v. 7, n. 12, p. 4305–4322, ago. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w7084305
[2] ARAÚJO, V. P. de et al. Groundwater isotopic variations in a uranium mining site: subsidies for contamination studies. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, v. 5, n. 2, p. 01–23, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v5i2.276
[3] STIEB, D. M. et al. Using maps to communicate environmental exposures and health risks: Review and best-practice recommendations. Environmental Research, v. 176, p. 108518, set. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.049
[4] FOSTER, S.; HIRATA, R.; ANDREO, B. The aquifer pollution vulnerability concept: aid or impediment in promoting groundwater protection? Hydrogeology Journal, v. 21, n. 7, p. 1389–1392, nov. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-013-1019-7
[5] ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA). DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings. [S. l.]: Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, 1987.
[6] BAALOUSHA, H. M. Vulnerability, probability and groundwater contamination risk. Environmental Earth Sciences, v. 76, n. 11, p. 384, maio 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6634-5
[7] KARAMOUZ, M.; AHMADI, A.; AKHBARI, M. Groundwater hydrology: engineering, planning, and management. 2. ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429265693
[8] WANG, J.; HE, J.; CHEN, H. Assessment of groundwater contamination risk using hazard quantification, a modified DRASTIC model and groundwater value, Beijing Plain, China. Science of The Total Environment, v. 432, p. 216–226, ago. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.005
[9] FOSTER, S. S. D. et al. Aquifer pollution vulnerability concept and tools–use, benefits and constraints. Groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping. IAH-selected Papers, v. 11, p. 2–9, 2007.
[10] IBE, K. M.; NWANKWOR, G. I.; ONYEKURU, S. O. Assessment of Ground Water Vulnerability and its Application to the Development of Protection Strategy for the Water Supply Aquifer in Owerri, Southeastern Nigeria. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, v. 67, n. 3, p. 323–360, mar. 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006358030562
[11] AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS (ASTM). Guide for Selection of Methods for Assessing Groundwater or Aquifer Sensitivity and Vulnerability. [S. l.]: ASTM International, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?D6030-15. Acesso em: 26 jan. 2021.
[12] ADUCK, J. N.; MUFUR, A. M.; FONTEH, M. F. A Review of Methods to Assess Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution. American Journal of Environmental Protection, v. 13, n. 4, p. 93–107, set. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20241304.12
[13] GÓMEZ-ESCALONILLA, V.; MARTÍNEZ-SANTOS, P. A Machine Learning Approach to Map the Vulnerability of Groundwater Resources to Agricultural Contamination. Hydrology, v. 11, n. 9, p. 153, set. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11090153
[14] INDÚSTRIAS NUCLEARES DO BRASIL (INB). Estudo Hidrogeológico Ambiental para Caracterização do Potencial de Contaminação dos Solos e Água Subterrânea na Área da Unidade de Concentrado de Urânio (URA) em Caetité - BA. Caetité: INB, 2004.
[15] INSTITUTO DE RADIOPROTEÇÃO E DOSIMETRIA (IRD). Sustainable Management of Groundwater in Caetité, Bahia, BR. [S. l.]: IRD, 2009. Relatório final.
[16] MARENGO, J. A. et al. Climatic characteristics of the 2010-2016 drought in the semiarid Northeast Brazil region. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Rio de Janeiro, v. 89, n. 2, p. 0-0, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720170206
[17] LOBATO, L. M. et al. U–Pb geochronology of the Lagoa Real uranium district, Brazil: Implications for the age of the uranium mineralization. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, v. 58, p. 129–140, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2014.12.005
[18] PLANARQ. Estudo de Impacto Ambiental do Complexo Uranífero Mínero-Industrial de Lagoa Real, Caetité, BA. [S. l.: s. n.], 1997.
[19] FERREIRA, C. E. G.; FERNANDES, N. F.; FRANKLIN, M. R. Mapeamento do uso e cobertura das terras da Bacia Hidrográfica do rio Vacas, Caetité –BA, para subsidiar o gerenciamento dos recursos hídricos. In: REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE MANEJO E CONSERVAÇÃO DO SOLO E DA ÁGUA, 18., 2010, Teresina. Anais... Teresina: [s. n.], 2010.
[20] SOBRINHO, G. A. N. Processos De Recarga E Avaliação Da Vulnerabilidade À Contaminação Da Água Subterrânea Em Áreas De Mineração De Urânio. 2023. Tese (Doutorado em Radioproteção e Dosimetria) — Instituto de Radioproteção e Dosimetria, Rio de Janeiro, 2023.
[21] WALCZUK, A.; CAMPOS, J. E. G.; AZEVEDO, J. H. de. Fractured and porous aquifer recharge in semiarid regions and the relevance of soil covers: A review for Caetité area, Bahia, Brazil. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, v. 159, p. 105525, jun. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2025.105525
[22] INDÚSTRIAS NUCLEARES DO BRASIL (INB). Estudo de Impacto Ambiental - EIA do Complexo Uranífero Mínero-Industrial de Lagoa Real. Caetité: INB, 1997. v. 1.
[23] OPENTOPOGRAPHY. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Global. [S. l.], 2013.
[24] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA). A Basic Toxicity Classification of Radionuclides. Vienna: IAEA, 1963. (Technical Report Series).
[25] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA). Handbook of parameter values for the prediction of radionuclide transfer in terrestrial and freshwater environments. Vienna: IAEA, 2010.
[26] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA). Live Chart of Nuclides: nuclear structure and decay data. Disponível em: https://nds.iaea.org/relnsd/vcharthtml/VChartHTML.html. Acesso em: 13 fev. 2025.
[27] INDÚSTRIAS NUCLEARES DO BRASIL (INB). Relatório Final de Análise de Segurança – RFAS, Gerenciamento das águas. [S. l.]: INB, 2007.
[28] INDÚSTRIAS NUCLEARES DO BRASIL (INB). Programa de monitoração ambiental operacional e de efluentes e rejeitos da mina cachoeira e pré-operacional da mina do engenho. Caetité: INB, 2020.
[29] MONDAL, N. C. et al. Determining shallow aquifer vulnerability by the DRASTIC model and hydrochemistry in granitic terrain, southern India. Journal of Earth System Science, v. 126, n. 6, p. 89, set. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0870-7
[30] EL MOUNTASSIR, O. et al. GIS-based assessment of aquifer vulnerability using DRASTIC model and stable isotope: a case study on Essaouira basin. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, v. 14, n. 4, p. 321, fev. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06540-6
Descargas
Publicado
Declaración de disponibilidad de datos
The authors declare that the data supporting the results of this study and the derived data supporting the conclusions of this study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Guilherme Augusto Nascimento Sobrinho, Nelson Ferreira Fernandes, Valeska Perez de Araújo, Mariza Ramalho Franklin
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Licencia: los artículos de BJRS tienen una licencia internacional Creative Commons Attribution 4.0, que permite el uso, el intercambio, la adaptación, la distribución y la reproducción en cualquier medio o formato, siempre que se otorgue el crédito correspondiente al autor o autores originales y a la fuente, proporcione un enlace a la licencia Creative Commons e indique si se realizaron cambios. Las imágenes u otros materiales de terceros en el artículo están incluidos en la licencia Creative Commons del artículo, a menos que se indique lo contrario en una línea de crédito al material. Si el material no está incluido en la licencia Creative Commons del artículo y su uso previsto no está permitido por la regulación legal o excede el uso permitido, el autor deberá obtener el permiso directamente del titular de los derechos de autor. Para ver una copia de esta licencia, visite http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
