Dosimetric evaluation of electron beam Monte Carlo isodoses distribution based on thermoluminescent dosimetry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v8i1.1108Keywords:
Electron dosimetry, Monte Carlo, TLDAbstract
Electron beams are applied in radiotherapy treatments where superficialized doses are desirable as well as deeper tissues sparing. Monte Carlo method has been recently implemented in the TPS as the algorithm for electron beam isodoses calculation at the National Institute of Cancer in Brazil. This work comprises an additional method of evaluation of the isodoses generated by the TPS, considering the irradiation of a non-flat surface. A 6-Gy electron beam breast irradiation was planned and delivered to an anthropomorphic phantom into which 36 capsules with TLD100 were inserted. The TLD calibration curve was performed from 100 cGy to 700 cGy. In an overall analysis, eMC algorithm isodose distribution results agreed with TLD measured doses. 75% of measured data met the 5% accuracy criteria, which can be considered in good agreement with the recommended uncertainties involved in a radiotherapy treatment. Considered all collected data, 8 TLDs received extremely low doses and due to tissue attenuation of the electron beam, the TLD measurements might have additional uncertainties. If these data are not taken into account, 100% of the measured doses, considering the uncertainties, meet the 5% accuracy criteria. About the 3 methods for isodose smoothing available in the eMC algorithm, the low level of dose smoothing option provides the best matching with measured data, consisting of the most reliable option. Considering the AAPM recommendations eMC algorithm offers an accurate solution for isodoses calculation, within a 5% accuracy.
- Views: 111
- PDF Downloads: 108
Downloads
References
Zhang A, Wen N, Nurushev T, Burmeister J, Chetty IJ. Comprehensive evaluation and clinical implementation of commercially available Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm. J Appl Clin Med Phys.14(2):127–45, 2013.
Cygler JE, Battista JJ, Scrimger JW, Mah E, Antolak J. Electron dose distributions in experimental phantoms: a comparison with 2D pencil beam calculations. Phys Med Biol. 32(9):1073–86, 1987.
Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Eclipse Photon and Electron Algorithms Reference Guide. Palo Alto, CA, United States of America, 2016.
Ding GX, Duggan DM, Coffey CW, Shokrani P, Cygler JE. First macro Monte Carlo based commercial dose calculation module for electron beam treatment planning—new issues for clinical consideration. Phys Med Biol. 51(11): 2781–99, 2006.
Lawrence SL, van Lieshout NHM, Charland PM. Assessment of Eclipse electron Monte Carlo output prediction for various topologies. J Appl Clin Med Phys.16(3): 99-106, 2015.
Robar V, Zankowski C, Pla MO, Podgorsak, EB. Thermoluminescent dosimetry in electron beams: Energy dependence. Med Phys 23, 667-73, 1996.
Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Relatório-Resumo do Serviço de Qualidade em Radiações Ionizantes 2009-2010. INCA: Rio de Janeiro, 2012.
Viegas CBB. Dosimetria In Vivo Com Uso De Detectores Semicondutores E Termoluminescentes Aplicada Ao Tratamento De Câncer De Cabeça E Pescoço. Thesis. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 2003.
Holt JG, Edelstein GR, Clark TE. Energy Dependence of the Response of lithium fluoride TLD rods in high energy electron fields. Phys Med Biol 20, 559-570, 1975.
Carver RL, Hogstrom KR, Chu C, Fields RS, Sprunger CP. Accuracy of pencil-beam redefinition algorithm dose calculations in patient-like cylindrical phantoms for bolus electron conformal therapy. Med Phys 40 (7), 071720:1-11, 2013.
Carver RL, Sprunger CP, Hogstrom KR, Popple RA, Antolak JA. Evaluation of the Eclipse eMC algorithm for bolus electron conformal therapy using a standard verification dataset. J Appl Clin Med Phys.17(3): 52-60, 2016.
Boyd RA, Hogstrom KR, Antolak JA, Shiu AS. A measured data set for evaluating electron-beam dose algorithms. Med Phys.28(6): 950-958, 2001.
Smilowitz JB, Das IJ, Feygelman V, Fraass BA, Kry SF, Marshall IR, Mihailidis DN, Ouhib Z, Ritter T, Snyder MG, Fairobent L. AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of Treatment Planning Dose Calculations — Megavoltage Photon and Electron Beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 16(5):14-34, 2015.
IAEA TRS-398. Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water. 2006.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/