Estudo comparativo de descritor de dose em exames pediátricos de tomografia computadorizada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v3i1A.126Keywords:
Computer Tomography, Pediatric, DoseAbstract
Computed tomography is considered a high radiation dose modality, and therefore establishment of diagnostic reference levels is highly recommended. These levels are expected not to be exceeded for standard procedures, when good practice is applied. Most CT scanners display a dose index, CTDIvol. For pediatric studies, this dose index is measured using a standard phantom and an ionization chamber, and does not represent patient dose, but a reference measurement. The objective of this study was to investigate the CTDIvol dose descriptor in head CT scans of a sample of pediatric patients, comparing them with the DRL presented in the literature. Data of head CT without contrast of 40 pediatric patients were retrospectively collected. The acquisition parameters of each examination were extracted from DICOM header and analyzed to assess the protocols typically used by technicians. The mean values of CTDIvol of each group were compared with the DRL values from literature. The measurement of accuracy indicated a difference of 11,6% with the CTDIvol registered by the scan, which can be explained by six different protocols used by technicians for the same exam. The variation is specially critic for the youngers than 1 year. Some children were submitted to a protocol with 50% higher dose than others. This group has 4% higher mean CTDIvol than DRL in literature, while other groups have lower values. The results show the role of medical physicist, optimizing clinical protocols to guarantee the maximum image quality with minimum dose.
- Views: 229
- PDF Downloads: 157
Downloads
References
AAPM – American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT. AAPM Report 60, 2008.
Alamo-Maestre, et al, CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based di-agnostic reference levels in Switzerland. European Society of Radiology, v. 18, p. 1980 – 1986 (2008).
Aurich, N.K, Níveis de Referência Diagnóstica de Tomografia Computadorizada em Pacientes Pediátricos. Porto Alegre (2012).
BfS, Referenzwerte für diagnostische und interventionelle Röntgenuntersuchungen. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz. (2010). Disponível em: http://www.bfs.de/de/ion/medizin/referenzwerte02.pdf. Último acesso em 24 de Março de 2014.
Dalmazo, J. et al, Otimização da Dose em Exames de Rotina em Tomografia Computa-dorizada: Estudo de Viabilidade em um Hospital Universitário. São Paulo (2010).
Dunn, et al, Doses from Computed Tomography (CT) Examinations in the UK - 2003 Review. Health Protection Agency - NRPB (2005).
Galasnki, et al, Paediatric CT Exposure Practice in the Federal Republic of Germany. mhh - Medizinhische Hochschule Hannover (2005). Disponível em: http://www.mhhannover.de/fileadmin/kliniken/diagnostische_radiologie/download/Report_German_Paed-CT-Survey_2005_06.pdf. Último acesso em 20 de Março de 2014.
Image Gently, Disponível em: http://www.imagegently.org/ Último acesso em 20 de Março de 2014.
Image Wisely, The CTDI Paradigm: A Practical Explanation for Medical Physicists. Disponível em: http://www.imagewisely.org/Imaging-Modalities/Computed-Tomography/Medical-Physicists/Articles/The-CTDI-Paradigm. Último acesso em: 04 de Ju-lho de 2014.
Kikuti, C.F, et al, Estimativa da Dose em Exames de Tomografia de Abdome com Base nos Valores de DLP. São Paulo (2013).
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Radiation Protection In Pe-diatric Radiology. Report No. 68. Bethesda, MD: NCRP (1978).
Pina, D.R, et al, Controle de Qualidade e Dosimetria em Equipamentos de Tomografia Computadorizada. São Paulo (2009).
Siemens. Somaton Emotion 6/16-slice configuration Application Guide (2007).
Strauss, K, "Child-size” the radiation delivered to pediatric patients, disponível em http://www.imagegently.org/WhatcanIdoasa/Physicist.aspx#2037486-ct. Último acesso em 20 de Março de 2014.
V. TSAPAKI, et al, Dose Reduction in CT while Maintaining Diagnostic Confidence: Diagnostic Reference Levels at Routine Head, Chest, and Abdominal CT—IAEA-coordinated Research Project. Radiology, 240(3), 828-834, (2006).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
