Expanded uncertainty assessment in fish samples analyzed by INAA and AAS

Authors

  • Bruno Tappiz University of São Paulo
  • Edson Gonçalves Moreira Energy and Nuclear Research Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v9i1A.1314

Keywords:

expanded uncertainty, fish samples, Neutron Activation Analysis, Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

Abstract

Measurement uncertainty was estimated following the EURACHEM guide (Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement) for the elements As, Br, Cl, Co, Cr, Cs, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Rb, Sb, Se and Zn determined by Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis (INAA) and for the elements Cd, Hg and Pb determined by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) in the fillet of the most consumed fish species at São Paulo city, Brazil. INAA expanded uncertainties ranged from 1.0 to 21% and the main contributions were due the counting statistics of sample and pipetted standards. For AAS, expanded uncertainties ranged from 6.5 to 13% and the main contributions were associated to the calibration curves. Uncertainty results were compared with the standard deviations of the mass fraction in the fishes (n = 10). Due to the wide variability in the mass fraction in the analyzed fish tissues, explained by factors such gender, age, fat content and fishing location of the specimens of each species, standard deviations were greater than expanded uncertainties, which means that the natural variability of the elements determined is greater than the data dispersion associated with the analytical techniques. Hence the used techniques were adequate for the fish fillet samples analyses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Bruno Tappiz, University of São Paulo

Reasearch Reactor Center

Edson Gonçalves Moreira, Energy and Nuclear Research Institute

Research Reactor Center

References

VIM - International Vocabulary of Metrology. Basic and general concepts and associated terms, 3rd ed. 2012, 91p.

EURACHEM/CITAC. Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2012, 133p.

EHMANN, W. D., VANCE, D. E. Radiochemistry and Nuclear Methods of Analysis, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1991.

WELZ, B., SPERLING, M. Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, 3rd ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 1999.

CIENFUEGOS, F., VAITSMAN, D. Análise Instrumental,1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: Interciência, 2000.

ZAHN, G. S., TICIANELLI, R. B., LANGE, C. N., FAVARO, D. I. T., FIGUEIREDO, A. M. G. Uncertainty analysis in comparative NAA applied to geological and biological matrices, In: INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR ATLANTIC CONFERENCE, 2015, São Paulo, Proceedings. p. 1-7.

FARRANT, T. J. D. Practical statistics for the analytical scientist. A bench guide. Cambridge, UK: LGC, 1997.

MOREIRA, E. G.; VASCONCELLOS, M. B. A., SAIKI, M., Uncertainty assessment in instrumental neutron activation analysis of biological materials. J Radioanal Nucl Chem, v. 269, p. 377-382, 2006.

CHU, S. Y. F.; EKSTRӦM, L. P.; FIRESTONE, R. B. The Lund/LBNL Nuclear Data Search, 1999. Available at: <http://nucleardata.nuclear.lu.se/toi/>. Last accessed 20 May 2020.

CORRALES, D., ACUÑA, A., SALHI, M., SAONA, G., BRUGNOLI, E. Copper, zinc, mercury and arsenic content in Micropogonias furnieri and Mugil platanus of the Montevideo coastal zone, Río de la Plata. Braz J Oceanogr, v. 64, p. 57-65, 2016.

FDA - Food and Drug Administration. Environmental Chemical Contaminants and Pesticides, 2020. 26p.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

Tappiz, B., & Moreira, E. G. (2021). Expanded uncertainty assessment in fish samples analyzed by INAA and AAS. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, 9(1A). https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v9i1A.1314

Issue

Section

The Meeting on Nuclear Applications (ENAN) 2019

Most read articles by the same author(s)