Long term comparison between reprocessed nuclear fuel cycles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2022.1999Keywords:
comparison, fuel cycle, reprocessed nuclear fuel, MOX, transuranicAbstract
Based on the idea of adopting closed fuel cycle in current pressurized water reactors (PWR) in order to reduce the use of natural uranium and recycle the spent fuel accumulated in the world inventory, this paper aims to compare two closed nuclear fuel cycles simulated at Model for Energy Supply Strategy Alternatives and their General Environmental Impacts (MESSAGE). The nuclear fuel cycles compared are: i) a closed fuel cycle with recovering of plutonium (Pu) to fabricate the mixed oxide (MOX) fuel; ii) a closed fuel cycle with recovering of a transuranic matrix to fabricate the transuranic fuel spiked with depleted uranium (TRU-U)O2. The comparison is based on the Brazilian nuclear energy system. They consider the time frame of 2019-2060 and the introduction of Angra 3 in the system. Advantages and disadvantages of using the strategy of operating with the different nuclear fuel cycles are shown, which include results regarding natural uranium consumption, spent fuel accumulation or utilization, nuclear waste and the nuclear fuel costs for both fuels.
- Views: 225
- PDF Downloads: 151
Downloads
References
´[1] World Nuclear Association. Processing of Used Nuclear Fuel. 2018. Available at <https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/fuel-recycling/processing-of-used-nuclear-fuel.aspx> Last accessed: 21 Augu. 2021.
Canal Energia. Operação de Angra 3 em 2026 é uma das frentes de atuação do Brasil na área nuclear, diz ministro. <https://www.canalenergia.com.br/noticias/53112100/operacao-de-angra-3-em-2026-e-uma-das-frentes-de-atuacao-do-brasil-na-area-nuclear-diz-ministro>. Last accessed: 20 June 2021.
Indústrias Nucleares do Brasil. Ciclo do combustível nuclear – Enriquecimento. <http://www.inb.gov.br/Nossas-Atividades/Ciclo-do-combustivel-nuclear/Enriquecimento>. Last accessed: 09 July 2021.
Indústrias Nucleares do Brasil. Ciclo do combustível nuclear – Conversão. <http://www.inb.gov.br/pt-br/Nossas-Atividades/Ciclo-do-combustivel-nuclear/Convers%C3%A3o>. Last accessed: 09 July 2021.
Brasil. Decreto no9.600, de 5 de dezembro de 2018. “Consolida as diretrizes sobre a Política Nuclear Brasileira”. 2018.
International Atomic Energy Agency. Modelling Nuclear Energy Systems with MESSAGE: A User's Guide. IAEA, Vienna. 2016.
Eletronuclear. Eletronuclear e Westinghouse assinam carta de intenções. Imprensa de mídias. 2020. <https://www.eletronuclear.gov.br/Imprensa-e-Midias/Paginas/Eletronuclear-e-Westinghouse-assinam-carta-de-inten%C3%A7%C3%B5es.aspx#>. Last accessed: 20 June 2021.
International Atomic Energy Agency. Power reactor information system (PRIS). <http://www.iaea.org/pris>. Last accessed: 21 Augu. 2021.
Eletronuclear. Angra 3. <https://www.eletronuclear.gov.br/Nossas-Atividades/Paginas/Angra-3.aspx>. Last accessed: 20 June 2021.
Eletronuclear. Informações de Angra 1. <http://www.eletronuclear.gov.br/Nossas-Atividades/Paginas/Informacoes-de-Angra-1.aspx>. Last accessed: 26 June 2021.
Eletronuclear. Informações de Angra 2. <http://www.eletronuclear.gov.br/Nossas-Atividades/Paginas/Informacoes-de-Angra-2.aspx>. Last accessed: 26 June 2021.
UxC. The Nuclear Fuel Price Reporter. <https://www.uxc.com/>. Last accessed: 26 June 2021.
International Atomic Energy Agency. Experience in Modelling Nuclear Energy Systems with MESSAGE: Country Case Studies. IAEA-TECDOC-1837, IAEA, Vienna. 2018.
F. B. A. Monteiro et al. Assessment of the Insertion of Reprocessed Fuels and Combined Tho-rium Fuel Cycles in a PWR System. MRS Proceedings. v. 1769, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2015.123
C. Pereira et al. Criticality safety analysis of spent fuel pool for a PWR using UO2, MOX, (Th-U)O2 and (TRU-Th)O2 fuels, Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, v. 7, n. 3A, pp. 1-16, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v7i3A.833
J. A. Pimentel. Spent fuel pool analysis for a pwr using different nuclear fuels. Dissertação (mestrado), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Engenharia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2019.
International Atomic Energy Agency. INPRO Methodology for Sustainability Assessment of Nuclear Energy Systems: Economics. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NG T 4.4, Vienna. 2014.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
