Mapping of processes and risks in the digital transformation in metrology of ionizing radiation, a case study in X-rays air kerma calibration

Igor Fernando Modesto Garcia; Jeovana Santos Ferreira; Eric Matos Macedo; Marcos Vinicius Teixeira Navarro; José Guilherme Pereira Peixoto

doi:10.15392/2319-0612.2023.2225

Authors

Igor Fernando Modesto Garcia Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Bahia.
Jeovana Santos Ferreira UFBA
Eric Macedo IFBA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-7486
Marcos Navarro IFBA
José Guilherme Peixoto IRD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2023.2225

Keywords:

Metrology 4.0, Calibration 4.0, X-rays, Risks, Management

Abstract

For the new metrological challenges of an increasingly digitized world, several countries are developing applications and infrastructure for Digital Calibration Certificates – DCC, researching the comparability of real and virtual measurements. Objective: to map the processes and risks related to the digital transformation of X-rays air kerma calibration. The Failure Mode and Effect Analysis - FMEA was used to quantify risks and is widely used in the aviation and automotive industry due to its reliability. The results presented a conceptual model for calibrating ionizing radiation quantities in the framework of new technologies and calibration 4.0 and comparing processes and risks. The conceptual model of calibration 4.0 comprises three main parts: a transmitter, the 4.0 communication network, and a receiver. Intelligent devices with configurations enable calibration data transfers by radio-frequency messaging in all these parts. Comparing risks in contemporary and calibration 4.0 processes, a slight reduction in the total risk can be observed. But new risks are unique to the 4.0 model, all with maximum severity, and how to mitigate them is still unknown. It is also possible to estimate that artificial intelligence and automation can significantly reduce measurement risks, identification, and error in the analysis and use of calibration certificates.

Views: 218
PDF Downloads: 142
XML Downloads: 23

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. C. Mosley, P. H. Paul Jr., L C. Megginson, Administração: Conceitos e Aplicações.pdf. 1986.

ABNT NBR ISO 9000: Sistemas de gestão da qualidade - fundamentos e vocabulário, “Sistemas de gestão da qualidade-Fundamentos e vocabulário,” 2015. [Online]. Available: www.abnt.org.br

L. Rocha, E. Savio, M. Marxer, and F. Ferreira, Education and training in coordinate metrology for industry towards digital manufacturing, J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1044, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1044/1/012026.

PTB, Metrology for AI in medicine Background, strategy and implementation recommendations, 2021.

M. S. Gadelrab and R. A. Abouhogail, Towards a new generation of digital calibration certificate: Analysis and survey, Measurement, vol. 181, no. May, p. 109611, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109611.

I. F. M. Garcia, M. J. Ferreira, E. M. Macedo, T. M. v Navarro, and J. P. G. Peixoto, The state of the art in management and metrology 4.0 for ionizing radiation, CBMRI-VIII-Congresso Brasileiro de Metrologia das Radiações Ionizantes, pp. 1–8, 2021.

ABNT NBR ISO/IEC 17025, Requisitos gerais para competência de laboratórios de ensaio e calibração., 2017.

A. G. Pereira, L. G. L. Vergara, E. A. D. Merino, and A. Wagner, Solutions in radiology services management: a literature review, Radiol Bras, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 298–304, 2015, doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0065.

R. B. Andres F., M. G. Jhon F, and N. B. Gonzalo, Caracterización de la gestión metrológica en instituciones sanitarias, Rev Ing Biomed, vol. 9, no. 18, pp. 57–64, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1909-97622015000200008&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es

de la Fuente Ruiz, Sonia, Implantación, Estudio Y Control De Calidad De Variables Climáticas En El Ámbito De La Metrología 4.0., 2019. [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228074073.pdf

Roberto Benitez;Roberto Benitez Jr;, Wireless calibration for Industry 4.0, 19th International Congress of Metrology, 2019.

G. M. Geronymo, Smart Lab: an application of Industry 4.0 designprinciples to calibration laboratories, J Phys Conf Ser, p. 6, 2021.

S. Andonov and M. Cundeva-Blajer, Calibration for Industry 4.0 Metrology: Touchless Calibration, J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1065, no. 7, pp. 0–4, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1065/7/072019.

Barra, H. C; Peixoto, J. G. Challenges for achieving 4.0 metrology in ionizing, metrologia 2019, p. 360, 2019.

S. Andonov and M. Cundeva-Blajer, FMEA for TCal: Risk analysis in compliance to EN ISO/IEC 17025:2017 requirements, 24th IMEKO TC4 International Symposium and 22nd International Workshop on ADC and DAC Modelling and Testing, pp. 222–227, 2020.

L. S. Goecksa, A. A. dos Santosa, and A. L. Korzenowskia, Decision-making trends in quality management: A literature review about industry 4.0, Production, vol. 30, 2020, doi: 10.1590/0103-6513.20190086.

A. Varshney, N. Garg, K. S. Nagla, T. S. Nair, S. K. Jaiswal, and S. Yadav, Challenges in Sensors Technology for Industry 4 . 0 for Futuristic Metrological Applications, MAPAN, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12647-021-00453-1.

K. C. Silveira Cunha et al., The Reliability of Metrologia 4.0 Data in the Industrial Technological Scenario: How This can Impact the Forms of Dimensional Control in the Industry, International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS), vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 34–38, 2020, doi: 10.31873/ijeas.7.04.05.

C. Brown, T. Elo, K. Hovhannisyan, D. Hutzschenreuter, P. Kuosmanen, O. Maennel, T. Mustapaa, P. Nikander, T. Wiedenhoefer, Infrastructure for Digital Calibration Certificates, in IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT, 2020, p. 4.

Micha Wieczorowski, Michał Paweł, Bartosz Gapiński , “Perspectives of modern metrology,” mechanik-science.com, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/METROI4.2019.8792886

R. Benitez, R. Benitez, C. Ramirez, J. A. Vasquez, Sensors calibration for Metrology 4.0, in II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT), 2019, p. 4.

D. H. Stamatis, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis FMEA from Theory to Execution. 2003.

International Atomic Energy Agency - IAEA, Technical reportes series n° TRS 457. Dosimetry in diagnóstic Radiology: An international code of pratice, Vienna, 2007.

I. F. M. Garcia, E. M. Macedo, M. V. T. Navarro, J. G. P. Peixoto. Mapping of processes and risks in the digital transformation in metrology of ionizing radiation - a case study in X-rays air kerma calibration. Physikalisch-TECHNISCHE BUNDESANSTALT - PTB, 3rd International Digital Calibration Certificate (DCC) Conference., Online, 2023.