Evaluation of the performance of radiological monitors in use, cities Salvador (BA) and Florianópolis (SC)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v7i3.882Keywords:
Evaluation, performance, diagnostics monitors.Abstract
Evaluate the performance of the monitors used for diagnosis based on the parameters defined by AAMP. Materials and Methods: Using calibrated instrumentation traceable to NIST and RBC, were evaluated in 15 monitors, according to the procedures described in AAMP's report 03 and the Spanish protocol in the following parameters: the general aspects of image quality, geometric distortion, screen reflection and room illumination, luminance response, luminance dependence, spatial and low contrast resolution, noise, internal reflection blanking and screen chromaticity. Results: 100% compliance for geometric distortion tests and 0% compliance for the luminance dependence test. Conclusions: There are nonspecific monitors for diagnosis being used for these purposes, without routinely checking tests, in rooms with high illumination and dirt on the screens and the non-implementation or inadequacy of acceptance and quality control tests. The monitors declared by the manufacturers as diagnostic specific on average showed a higher compliance rate- Views: 120
- PDF Downloads: 172
Downloads
References
AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Report 03 - Assessmente of display perfomance for medical imaging systems. 2005;4095:155. Avaliable at: <https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/or_03.pdf>. Last accessed:11 Feb. 2019.
SEFM, SEPR, SERAM. Protocolo Español De Control De Calidad En Radiodiagnóstico. 2011;77–132. Avaliable at: <https://www.sergas.es/Saude-publica/Documents/2958/Protocolo%20espanol-version%201.pdf>. Last accessed:11 Feb. 2019.
Ministério Da Saúde. PORTARIA Nº 2.898, DE 28 DE NOVEMBRO DE 2013. Brasil. Avaliable at: <http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2013/prt2898_28_11_2013.html>. Last accessed:11 Feb. 2019.
CFM – Conselho Federal de Medicina. RESOLUÇÃO CFM No 2.107/2014. Brasil. Avaliable at: <http://www.portalmedico.org.br/resolucoes/CFM/2014/2107_2014.pdf>. Last accessed:11 Feb. 2019.
SAUNDERS RS, SAMEI E. Resolution and noise measurements of five CRT and LCD medical displays. Med Phys. 2006;33(2):308–19.
RIBEIRO LD, APARECIDA T, FURQUIM C. Estudo do desempenho de display devicees LCD utilizados em radiologia digital. 2010;32:7–12 Avaliable at: <http://spr.org.br/wp-content/uploads/estudo-dos-display devicees-lcd.pdf>. Last accessed:11 Feb. 2019.
GARCIA, I.F.M. AVALIAÇÃO DO DESEMPENHO DOS DISPLAY DEVICEES USADOS PARA DIAGNÓSTICO. Dissertação (Mestrado em Tecnologias em Saúde) Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saude Publica. Salvador. p.105.2016. Avaliable at: <https://www.repositorio.bahiana.edu.br:8443/jspui/handle/bahiana/782/statistics>. Last accessed:11 Feb. 2019.
MEDEIROS RB, ALVES FFR, RUBERTI FILHA EM, FINGERMAN F, PADOVAN AH, ELIAS S, et al. Influência da luminância do negatoscópio na detectabilidade de fibras e microcalcificações, determinada por meio de objetos simulados. Radiol Bras. 2003;36(1):21–5
Board of the Faculty of Clinical Radiology. Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) and quality assurance Second edition. 2012. Avaliable at:
<https://www.rcr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/docs/radiology/pdf/BFCR(12)15_PACS_QA.pdf> .Last accessed:11 Feb. 2019.
AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Report NO. 270 - Display Quality Assurance. 2019;85-9 <https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_270.pdf> Last accessed:11 Feb. 2019.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/