Evaluation of the detector linearity response of the DR system in different x-ray bean filters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2472Keywords:
direct digital radiography, Image quality, linearity, filtrationAbstract
In the recent past, at Brazilian radiology services, direct digital radiography (DR) systems are replacing Computed Radiography (CR). This situation provides several significant advantages such as improving digital image quality, patient effective dose reduction, and improved speed of examinations performed. To evaluate DR systems, various organizations have published protocols with guidelines concerning quality assurance and acceptance tests for DRs. In these protocols, there are methodologies for evaluating several parameters, such as the detector linearity response (DLR). To test the DLR, different methodologies are proposed by the organizations, such as the application of different additional filters on the X-ray beams spectrum to promote the X-ray doses suitable to produce the latent image in the DR. The objective of this work was to evaluate the results of different protocol methodologies for carrying out the DLR test of a DR flat panel. An analogic radiology equipment, a primary ionization chamber, a DR system and images unprocessed were used in this study. As indicated by the protocols, the spectra of the X-rays were modified by additional filters of copper (Cu) with aluminum (Al); Al; Cu; and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). The spectra of the X-rays were modified to achieve the exposure range of 0.1 to 7 mR. The results showed that the DLR curves adjustment were R²>0.99, for a logarithmic equation, type y=a.ln(x)+b. For the filters of 0.5 mmCu with 1.0 mmAl; 11.5 mmAl; 1.0 mmCu; 21 mmAl the mean pixel values showed 0.9% of the coefficient of variation (COV), while for 10 cm PMMA filters, the COV increased to 2.7%. The study showed that methodologies using Al, Cu and Al with Cu filters DLR have similar responses while using PMMA, the response was slightly different.
Downloads
References
MICHAEL, K. T. The Application Of Quantitative Data Analysis For The Assessment Of Flat Panel X-Ray Detectors In Digital Radiography As Part Of A Quality Assurance Programme. Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express, v. 3, n.3, p. 1-15, 035004, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aa6c75
SEIBERT, J. A., BOGUCKI, T. M., CIONA, T., HUDA, W., KARELLAS, A., MERCIER, J. R., ... & WILLIS, C. E. Acceptance Testing And Quality Control Of Photostimulable Storage Phosphor Imaging Systems. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report, 93. Report of AAPM Task Group 10. College Park, MD 2006. ISBN-13: 978-1-888340-64-8.
NAVY & MARINE CORPS PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER. Navy Diagnostic Imaging Equipment Performance Survey Manual. NMCPHC Technical Manual TM-6470.1A. Portsmouth, VA. Jan 2020.
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY. Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology: An International Code of Practice, IAEA Technical Reports Series nº 457, ISSN 0074–1914 ; no. 457. Vienna, 2007. ISBN 92–0–115406–2.
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY. Protocolos de Control de Calidad para Radiodiagnóstico en América Latina y el Caribe. IAEA-TECDOC-1958. Vienna, 2021. ISBN 978-92-0-327021-2.
BUSHONG, S. C. The X-Ray BeamPart II, Chapter 9 - 11. Radiologic Science for Technologists. St. Louis, Missouri, 2001. p. 105-152. ISBN 0-323-01337-6.
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/