A Proposed Regulatory Framework for Ageing Management of Nuclear Research Reactors: Evidence from the Brazilian IPR-R1 TRIGA® Case

Authors

  • Valéria Emiliana Alves Center for the Development of Nuclear Technology , Centro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear image/svg+xml
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
    • Conceptualization
    • Formal Analysis
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
  • Amir Zacarias Mesquita Centro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear image/svg+xml
    • Validation
    • Supervision
  • Daniel Artur Pinheiro Palma Autoridade Nacional de Segurança Nuclear
    • Validation
    • Supervision

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2026.3111

Keywords:

aging management, research reactors, nuclear regulation, sustainable operation, hybrid energy systems

Abstract

Nuclear Research Reactors (NRRs) are essential infrastructures for radioisotope production, materials research, education, training and technological development related to low-carbon energy systems. A large share of the global NRR fleet has operated for several decades, which increases the regulatory relevance of physical degradation, technological obsolescence and preservation of organizational knowledge. This paper proposes a graded regulatory framework for ageing management of Brazilian research reactors, using the IPR-R1 TRIGA® reactor as an applied regulatory case. The method combines documentary and normative analysis, comparative assessment of international guidance and a regulatory-technical case study. The evidence base included IAEA safety standards and reports, U.S. NRC non-power reactor guidance, Brazilian licensing instruments, the IPR-R1 ageing management documentation and the institutional transition from Brazilian Nuclear Energy Commission (CNEN) to Brazilian Nuclear Safety Authority (ANSN). The results show that ageing management for research reactors should not be treated as a direct equivalent of long-term operation or license renewal for power reactors. Instead, it should be structured as a continuous, risk-informed and auditable regulatory process. The proposed framework is organized around five elements: mandatory ageing management programmes; screening and classification of structures, systems and components important to safety; TLAA-equivalent or residual-life assessments when original time-limited design data are unavailable; periodic safety review as an integrated regulatory anchor; and clear allocation of responsibilities between the operator and the regulatory body. The Brazilian IPR-R1 case demonstrates the feasibility of using existing operational, maintenance and licensing evidence to support continued safe operation, provided that the evidence is consolidated into a traceable regulatory model. The study concludes that a specific regulation or preparatory technical note for research reactors would improve regulatory predictability, institutional coherence and alignment with international best practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Valéria Emiliana Alves, Center for the Development of Nuclear Technology, Centro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear

    PhD candidate and Master's degree in Nuclear Science and Technology at CDTN/Cnen in Brazil, focusing on regulatory frameworks.Master's degree funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes) (2020-2022). Regulatory Affairs Expert and Energy's lawyer. 

  • Amir Zacarias Mesquita, Centro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear

    Bolsista de Produtividade em Pesquisa - PQ/CNPq (2017-2027). Pesquisador de Produtividade e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico - DT/CNPq (2010-2016). Pesquisador Mineiro - Fapemig (2008 a 2024). Doutor em Engenharia Química - Universidade Estadual de Campinas/Unicamp (2005). Mestre em Ciências e Técnicas e Nucleares - (1981) e Graduado em Engenharia Elétrica (1978), ambos pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais/UFMG. Pesquisador do Centro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear/Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear - CDTN/Cnen (desde 1982).

  • Daniel Artur Pinheiro Palma, Autoridade Nacional de Segurança Nuclear

    Possui graduação em Bacharelado em Física pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2002) e em Ciências Econômicas pela Universidade do Norte do Paraná (2018). Concluiu também um curso de Pós-graduação lato sensu em Economia pela Faculdade Signorelli (2018). Além disso, possui Mestrado em Física pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2004), na área de Teoria Quântica de Campos, com ênfase no Efeito Casimir, e Doutorado em Engenharia Nuclear com ênfase em Física de Reatores pela Coordenação dos Programas de Pós-graduação de Engenharia (COPPE/UFRJ) (2007). Realizou estágio de pós-doutorado no LMP/PEN/COPPE nos anos de 2008 e 2009.Atualmente, é Tecnologista Sênior III e ocupa o cargo de Coordenador Geral de Reatores na Autoridade Nacional de Segurança Nuclear (ANSN).

References

[1] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA). Ageing Management for Research Reactors: Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-10 (Rev. 1). Vienna: IAEA, 2024. [1, 2]

[2] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA). Research Reactors Database (RRDB). Vienna: IAEA, [s.d.]. Disponível em: https://nucleus.iaea.org/rrdb. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2026.

[3] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA). Nuclear Energy in the Sustainable Development Agenda. Vienna: IAEA, 2016. [1]

[4] INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY (IEA). The Path to a New Era for Nuclear Energy. Paris: IEA, 2025.

[5] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA). Safety of Research Reactors: Specific Safety Requirements No. SSR-3. Vienna: IAEA, 2016. [1, 2]

[6] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA). Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors: Safety Reports Series No. 99. Vienna: IAEA, 2020.

[7] COMISSÃO NACIONAL DE ENERGIA NUCLEAR (CNEN). Resolução CNEN nº 226, de 1º de fevereiro de 2018. Autorização para Operação Permanente do Reator Triga IPR-R1. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 2018.

[8] CENTRO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO DA TECNOLOGIA NUCLEAR (CDTN). Plano de Gestão do Envelhecimento do Reator TRIGA IPR-R1. Belo Horizonte: CDTN, 2023. [1]

[9] MESQUITA, A. Z. et al. IPR-R1 TRIGA reactor ageing management approach. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, v. 12, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2670

[10] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA). Safety in the Utilization and Modification of Research Reactors: Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-24. Vienna: IAEA, 2022. [1, 2]

[11] U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (US NRC). Guidelines for Preparing and Reviewing Applications for the Licensing of Non-Power Reactors: NUREG-1537, Parts 1 and 2. Washington, DC: U.S. NRC, 1996.

[12] COMISSÃO NACIONAL DE ENERGIA NUCLEAR (CNEN). CNEN-NE-1.04: Licenciamento de Instalações Nucleares. Rio de Janeiro: CNEN, 2002.

[13] BRASIL. Lei nº 14.222, de 15 de outubro de 2021. Cria a Autoridade Nacional de Segurança Nuclear. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 2021.

[14] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA). Development of Time Limited Ageing Analyses to Support Continued Safe Operation of Research Reactors (T34005): Coordinated Research Project. Vienna: IAEA, 2024-2028.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

Data Availability Statement

This study is based on the analysis of publicly available regulatory frameworks, technical reports, and institutional publications (e.g., IAEA and U.S. NRC). No primary datasets were generated. All sources used are properly cited and can be accessed through the respective official repositories.

Issue

Section

Original Articles