A fuzzy method for the usability evaluation of nuclear medical equipment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v9i2A.363Keywords:
usability, fuzz logic, medical equipmentAbstract
To avoid errors when handling nuclear medical equipment, it is important to develop products with a high degree of usability. This can be achieved by performing usability evaluations in the product development process to detect and mitigate potential usability problems. Usability evaluation focuses on how well users can learn and use a product to achieve their goals. To gather information about usability, practitioners use a variety of methods that gather feedback from users about an existing interface or plans related to a new interface. A wide range of usability evaluation methods have been proposed, but few methods focus on developing an objective and practical evaluation method for usability. Moreover, the usability evaluations are based on human judgments and most methods cannot fully solve the subjectivity of these evaluations. In order to remedy this deficiency, the purpose of this work is to adopt a Fuzzy Set Theory (FST) approach to establish a method for the usability evaluation of nuclear medical equipment based on usability heuristics for user interface design and international standards for ergonomics of human-system interaction. To exemplify the method we performed a usability evaluating of the Digital Spectrometer ESP 13004 by testing it with representative users. The results showed that the method is a proactive tool to provide a basis for checking usability of medical device interfaces.
Downloads
References
Hyman, W.A. Errors in the Use of Medical Equipment. In:Bogner, M.S.(Ed.), Human Error in Medicine. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1994).
Rubin, J. Handbook of usability testing. New York: John Wiley & Sons (2004).
Preece, J., Roger, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., Carey, T. Human-computer interac-tion. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1994).
Axtell, C. M. Problems Integrating User Participation into Software Development. Interna-tional J. Human-Computer Studies, v. 47, 2, p. 323-345 (1997).
Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. Academic Press, San Diego, (1993).
Bastien, C.; Scapin, D. Ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of human-computer interfac-es. Report Technique, Rocquencourt: Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Au-tomatique, 153, (1993).
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241: Usability Requirements (1998).
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., Beale, R. Human-Computer Interaction. Prentice-Hall Inter-national (1998).
Zadeh, L. A. “Fuzzy Logic = Computing with words”. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 4, pp. 103-111 (1996).
Grecco, C. H. S., Vidal, M. C., Cosenza, C. A. N., Santos, I. J.A. L., Carvalho, P. V. R. Safety culture assessment: A fuzzy model for improving safety performance in a radioactive installa-tion. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 70, pp. 71-83 (2014).
Gentile, M., Rogers, W., Mannan, M. Development of an inherent safety index based on fuzzy logic. AIChE Journal, 49 (4), pp. 959-968 (2003).
Nunes I. L. ERGO X – The model of a fuzzy expert system for workstation ergonomic analy-sis. In: International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, Karwowski W. (Ed.), CRC Press, pp. 3114-3121 (2006).
Shneiderman, B. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interactions. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1992).
Hsu, H. M., Chen, C. T. Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 79. pp. 279-285 (1996).
Yager, R. R., Filev, D. P. On the issue of defuzzification and selection based on a fuzzy set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55, pp. 255-272 (1993).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/