Influence of dose rate on radiotherapy treatment of the U87MG cell line through cell viability

Authors

  • Arthur Rocha UFRJ , Federal University of Rio de Janeiro image/svg+xml
    • Ruy Rayol Neto UFRJ , Federal University of Rio de Janeiro image/svg+xml
      • Debora Assis Carneiro IFRJ , Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro image/svg+xml
        • Delano Valdivino Batista Quinta D'Or , Institute of Radiation Protection and Dosimetry image/svg+xml
          • Luiz Antonio Ribeiro da Rosa IRD , Institute of Radiation Protection and Dosimetry image/svg+xml
            • Mariana Paranhos Stelling IFRJ , Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro image/svg+xml
              • Simone Coutinho Cardoso Federal University of Rio de Janeiro image/svg+xml , Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro image/svg+xml

                DOI:

                https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2621

                Keywords:

                Glioblastoma multiforme, Radiotherapy, cell line, U87MG, dose rates, cell viability, MTT

                Abstract

                Glioblastoma multiforme is a tumor that affects glial cells and is common in humans, being the most aggressive of gliomas. Patients, after diagnosis, have an average survival of just over a year, even when undergoing standard treatment. Given the low estimated survival of patients with this type of tumor, the objective of the study is to investigate the contribution of dose rate in radiotherapeutic treatment using a human glioblastoma cell line called U87MG, through the MTT (brometo de 3-[4,5-dimetiltiazol-2-il]-2,5-difenil tetrazólio) cell viability assay. Three dose rates were tested, including 400 cGy/min which is used clinically in patients, as well as 1.400 and 3.300 cGy/min from a clinical linear accelerator. Sterile culture plates with U87MG cells were irradiated, then, manipulated in the laboratory for the execution of the cell viability assay. The irradiated plates showed lower cell viability than the non-irradiated group, but there was no significant difference in viability among the different tested dose rates.

                Downloads

                Download data is not yet available.

                References

                [1] ALIFIERIS, Constantinos; TRAFALIS, Dimitrios T. Glioblastoma multiforme: Pathogenesis and treatment. Pharmacology & therapeutics, v. 152, p. 63-82, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.05.005

                [2] WEN, Patrick Y.; KESARI, Santosh. Malignant gliomas in adults. New England Journal of Medicine, v. 359, n. 5, p. 492-507, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0708126

                [3] CLOUGHESY, Timothy F.; CAVENEE, Webster K.; MISCHEL, Paul S. Glioblastoma: from molecular pathology to targeted treatment. Annual review of pathology: mechanisms of disease, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-25, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130324

                [4] BARANI, Igor J.; LARSON, David A. Radiation therapy of glioblastoma. Current understanding and treatment of gliomas, p. 49-73, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12048-5_4

                [5] CHÉDEVILLE, Agathe L.; MADUREIRA, Patricia A. The role of hypoxia in glioblastoma radiotherapy resistance. Cancers, v. 13, n. 3, p. 542, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13030542

                [6] GHASEMI, Mahshid et al. The MTT assay: utility, limitations, pitfalls, and interpretation in bulk and single-cell analysis. International journal of molecular sciences, v. 22, n. 23, p. 12827, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312827

                Downloads

                Published

                2025-12-08