Computational Analysis of Gamma-Ray and Fast Neutron Attenuation performance of some Thorium and Uranium Compounds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2025.2868Keywords:
Shielding effectiveness, Energy absorption, Effective atomic number, effective removal cross-sectionAbstract
Evaluation of the radiation shielding effectiveness of some compounds including Fe, Th, Y, Nb, Ta, Ti, and U have been computed for energy absorption and total interaction in the photon energy range from 0.015 to 15 MeV. The effective atomic number (Zeff), of these compounds was determined via the mass attenuation (µ/ρ, cm2/g) and mass energy absorption (µ/ρ, cm2/g)en coefficients. Accordingly, the values of Zeff have been computed for total photon interaction (ZIeff) and energy absorption (ZAeff) using Py-MLBUF and Phy-X/PSD codes. The effective removal cross section for fast neutrons (ΣR, cm-1) and attenuation lengths were also calculated to study the attenuation properties of fast neutrons. The results displayed showed that, Zeff of S1 (UO2) and S2 (ThSiO4) are comparatively higher than the Zeff of the remaining compounds, while S7 (Fe(UO2)2(PO4)2.8(H2O)) possesses the lowest values of Zeff. The obtained results also show that ZAeff should be used instead of ZIeff when the quantity of interest is energy dissipation. In addition, the calculated values of ΣR for the tested compounds were found to be close and ranged from 0.079 cm-1 for S4 to 0.146 cm-1 for S1. Moreover, comparison of the calculated values for different shielding parameters showed good agreement between the proposed methods. Finally, this study could be useful in applications of these compounds for shielding requirements from gamma-ray and fast neutron in different fields such as, nuclear fuel cycles and medical shielding in uranium-handling environments.
Downloads
References
[1] Kaewkhao, J., et al., Determination of effective atomic numbers and effective electron densities for Cu/Zn alloy, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, v. 109, n. 7, p. 1260-1265, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.10.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.10.007
[2] Kurudirek, M, et al., Chemical composition, effective atomic number and electron density study of trommel sieve waste (TSW), Portland cement, lime, pointing and their admixtures with TSW in different proportions. Appl. Radiat. Isot., v. 68, n. 6, p. 1006-11, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.12.039
[3] Kirdsiri, K., et al., Gamma-rays shielding properties of xPbO:(100−x)B2O3 glasses system at 662keV, Annals of Nuclear Energy, v. 36, n. 9, p. 1360-1365, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.06.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.06.019
[4] Singh, K., et al., Gamma-ray attenuation coefficients in bismuth borate glasses. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B, v. 194, p. 1–6, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(02)00498-6
[5] Singh, S., et al., Barium borate-fly ash glasses: as radiation shielding materials. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B, v. 266, p. 140–146, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.10.018
[6] Ozdemir, Y. and Kurudirek, M., A study of total mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and electron densities for various organic and inorganic compounds at 59.54 keV. Ann. Nucl. Energy, v. 36, p. 1769–1773, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.09.008
[7] Kurudirek, M. and Ozdemir, Y., Determination of effective atomic numbers in some compounds for photoelectric process at 59.54 keV by using different methods. J. X-ray Sci. Technol., v. 18, p. 183–191, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-2010-0253
[8] Osman, A. M., Calculation of Gamma and Neutron Shielding Parameters for Reinforced Polymer Composites, ASME. ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci.; v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054547
[9] Murty, V. R. K., Effective atomic numbers for W/Cu alloy for total photon attenuation. Radiat. Phys. Chem., v. 71, p. 667–669, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.04.046
[10] El-Kateb, A. H., et al., Determination of atomic cross-sections and effective atomic numbers for some alloys. Ann. Nucl. Energy, v. 27, p. 1333–1343, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4549(99)00121-8
[11] A. M. Abdelmonem, et al., Computing the gamma-ray, charged particles and fast neutron-shielding performances of selected alloys, Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids, v. 179, n. 9-10, p. 1105-1131, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10420150.2024.2332193
[12] Gowda, S., et al., Studies on effective atomic numbers and electron densities in amino acids and sugars in the energy range 30–1333 keV. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B, v. 239, p. 361–369, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2005.05.048
[13] Manjunathaguru, V. and Umesh, T.K., Effective atomic numbers and electron densities of some biologically important compounds containing H, C, N and O in the energy range 145–1330 keV. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., v. 39, p. 3969–3981, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/39/18/025
[14] Osman, A. M., Analysis of radiation shielding effectiveness of hydride and borohydride metals for nuclear industry, International Journal of Advanced Nuclear Reactor Design and Technology, v. 5, n. 1, p. 30-43, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jandt.2023.04.001
[15] Manjunathaguru, V. and Umesh, T. K., Total interaction cross sections and effective atomic numbers of some biologically important compounds containing H, C, N and O in the energy range 6.4–136 keV. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., v. 40, p. 3707–3718, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/40/18/010
[16] Manohara, S.R., et al., Studies on effective atomic number, electron density and kerma for some fatty acids and carbohydrates. Phys. Med. Biol., v. 53, p. 377–386, 2008a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/20/N01
[17] Manohara, S. R., et al., Photon interaction and energy absorption in glass: a transparent gamma ray shield. J. Nucl. Mater., v. 393, p. 465–472, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.07.001
[18] Manohara, S.R., et al., The effective atomic number revisited in the light of modern photon-interaction cross section databases. Appl. Radiat. Isot., v. 68, p. 784–787, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.09.047
[19] Kurudirek, M., et al., Effective atomic number study of various alloys for total photon interaction in the energy region of 1 keV to 100 GeV. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, v. 613, p. 251–256, 2010b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2009.11.061
[20] El-Khayatt, A.M. and El-Sayed Abdo, A., MERCSF-N calculation program for fast neutron qremoval cross-sections in composite shields. Ann. Nucl. Energy, v. 36, p. 832–836, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.01.013
[21] El-Khayatt, A.M., Radiation shielding of concretes containing different lime/ silica ratios. Ann. Nucl. Energy, v. 37, p. 7991–995, 2010a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2010.03.001
[22] El-Khayatt, A.M., Calculation of fast neutron removal cross-sections for some compounds and materials. Ann. Nucl. Energy, v. 37, n. 2, p. 218–222, 2010b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.10.022
[23] Kulwinder Singh Mann and Sukhmanjit Singh Mann, Py-MLBUF: Development of an online-platform for gamma-ray shielding calculations and investigations, Annals of Nuclear Energy, v. 150, p. 1 – 22, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107845
[24] Erdem Sakar, et al., Phy-X/PSD: development of user friendly online software for calculation of parameters relevant to radiation shielding and dosimetry. Rad. Phys. Chem., v. 166, p. 1-12, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108496
[25] Hubbell, J.H., Seltzer, S.M., Tables of X-ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy Absorption Coefficients from 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest. Report NISTIR 5632, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.5632
[26] Manjunatha, H. C., A study of gamma attenuation parameters in poly methyl methacrylate and Kapton. Radiat. Phys. Chem., v. 137, p. 254 – 259, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.01.024
[27] Devillers, M. A. C., Lifetime of electrons in metals at room-temperature. Solid State Commun., v. 49, p. 1019 – 1022, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(84)90413-7
[28] Aboudeif, Y., et al., An evaluation of the radiation protection characteristics of prototyped oxide glasses utilizing PhyX/PSD software, J. Instrum. v. 15, n. 8, p. P08005, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/15/08/P08005
[29] Shultis J. K., Faw, R. E., Fundamentals of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b12824
[30] Martin, J. E., Physics for radiation protection (2nd ed.). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 A. M. Osman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
