The Standardization of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Presets on the Elekta XVI System for Optimized Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2026.3027Keywords:
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), Elekta XVI, image quality optimization, dose reduction, IGRT standardizationAbstract
Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) relies on accurate imaging systems to ensure precise patient positioning and target localization. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) integrated into the Elekta XVI platform enables volumetric imaging with soft-tissue visualization, but image quality and patient dose strongly depend on acquisition parameters, or “presets.” This study presents a comprehensive methodology for standardizing CBCT presets on the Elekta XVI system to optimize image quality, geometric accuracy, and radiation dose according to the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle. Eighteen acquisition configurations were systematically evaluated by varying tube potential, tube current, exposure time, filtration, collimation, gantry speed, and projection number. Radiation dose was measured using a calibrated ionization chamber, while image quality was assessed through Catphan 503 phantom analysis using the PyLinac software, quantifying uniformity, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), spatial resolution (MTF), and geometric accuracy. Results showed that tube potential (kV) was the dominant factor influencing image uniformity (ρ = 0.674, p = 0.0229) and contrast (ρ = 0.676, p = 0.0225), while dose scaled linearly with tube current and exposure time. Bow-tie filtration (F1) reduced central dose by approximately 25% and improved CNR. Geometric accuracy remained within ±1 mm for all protocols. Based on these quantitative relationships, standardized clinical presets were established for distinct anatomical sites (Head and Neck, Chest, Prostate and Pelvis), combining higher tube potential with reduced mAs to balance photon penetration, image contrast, acquisition time, and dose efficiency. The resulting protocols ensure reproducible image quality, and minimized patient exposure. This framework demonstrates that data-driven standardization of CBCT presets enhances both safety and precision in daily IGRT practice and provides a foundation for future adaptive radiotherapy integration.
Downloads
References
[1] DING, G. X.; ALAEI, P.; CURRAN, B.; FLYNN, R.; GOSSMAN, M.; MACKIE, T. R.; MIFTEN, M.; MORIN, R.; XU, X.; ZHU, T. C. Image guidance doses delivered during radiotherapy: Quantification, management, and reduction: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group 180. Medical Physics, Alexandria, VA: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, v. 45, n. 5, p. e1121–e1146, 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12824
[2] BISSONNETTE, J.-P.; BALTER, P. A.; DONG, L.; LANGEN, K. M.; LOVEOCK, D. M.; MIFTEN, M.; MOSELEY, D. J.; POULIOT, J.; SONKE, J.-J.; YOO, S. Quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy utilizing CT-based technologies: A report of the AAPM TG-179. Medical Physics, Alexandria, VA: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, v. 39, n. 4, p. 1741–1763, 2012. DOI: 10.1118/1.3690466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3690466
[3] OLIVEIRA, J.B.; NERSISSIAN, D.Y.; YOSHIMURA, E.M. Tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico (CBCT) em radioterapia guiada por imagem (IGRT): dosimetria e qualidade de imagem [Internet]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; 2021 [cited 2025 Nov 7]. Trabalho de conclusão de curso (Residência em Medicina).
[4] KERNS, J.R. Pylinac: Image analysis for routine quality assurance in radiotherapy [Internet]. Version 3.39.0. 2023 [cited 2025 Nov 07]. Available from: https://pylinac.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
[5] The Phantom Laboratory, Inc. Catphan® 503 Manual. Greenwich, NY: The Phantom Laboratory, Inc.; 2017
[6] DOWNES, P.; JARVIS, R.; RADU, E.; KAWRAKOW, I.; SPEZI, E. Monte Carlo simulation and patient dosimetry for a kilovoltage cone-beam CT unit. Medical Physics. 2009 Sep;36(9):4156-4167. doi:10.1118/1.3196182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3196182
[7] AL-KABKABI, A.; RAMACHANDRAN, P.; AAMRY, A.; TAMAM, N.; ABUHADI, N. H.; JOHARY, Y.; AAMRI, H.; SULIEMAN, A.; TRAPP, J. Assessment of cone beam computed tomography image quality and dose for commonly used pre-sets in external beam radiotherapy. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2022; 199:110287. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110287
[8] WILSON, L. J.; HADJIPANTELI, A.; ØSTERGAARD, D. E.; BOGAERT, E.; BROWN, K. F.; DEJONG, R.; EARLEY, J.; EDOUARD, M.; KHAN, M.; LINDSAY, J.; VAN DER HIMST, J.; DING, G. X.; WOOD, T.; AZNAR, M. C.; JORNET, N.; NTENTAS, G. ET AL. (2025). Cone Beam CT Dose Optimisation: A Review and Expert Consensus by the 2022 ESTRO Physics Workshop IGRT Working Group. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 209, Article 110958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110958
[9] KAMATH S.; SONG W.; CHVETSOV A.; OZAWA S.; LU H.; SAMANT S.; LIU C.; LI J.G.; PALTA J.R. An image quality comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2011 Feb 4;12(2):376-390. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3435
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Victor Augusto Bertotti Ribeiro, Hélio Yoriyaz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/






















