Modeling and Implementation of an Automated Gamma Radiography Inspection System with Robotic Positioning and Bidimensional Radiative Mapping in Cartesian Coordinates

Authors

  • Leandro Moreira Costa Silva Military Institute of Engineering image/svg+xml
    • Paulo Cesar Rocha Silveira Military Institute of Engineering image/svg+xml

      DOI:

      https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2026.3075

      Keywords:

      Industrial radiography, gamma-ray transmission, CZT detector, Cartesian positioning, radiometric mapping, Cesium-137, non-destructive testing

      Abstract

      This work presents the engineering architecture and controlled radiometric evaluation of a gamma-ray inspection system conceived for Cartesian X-Y automation in non-destructive testing of metallic plates. The architecture combines a Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT) detector, a collimated Cesium-137 source, lead shielding, Cartesian positioning, and computational mapping. The radiometric dataset reported here was acquired before complete motion integration: the source and detector remained fixed while aluminum plates of nominal 200 x 200 mm and 1 mm or 2 mm thickness were manually repositioned over a 4 x 4 grid. Three consecutive count-rate readings were averaged at each of the sixteen points and corrected using the recorded point-specific background. The resulting net count rates were associated with Cartesian coordinates and displayed as non-interpolated two-dimensional maps. Net count rates ranged from 1206.00 to 2213.67 cps for the 1 mm specimen and from 1538.00 to 2264.67 cps for the 2 mm specimen. Within each specimen, grouped values increased with the inferred open-hole condition; however, the two thickness series were non-monotonic and cannot be interpreted as an isolated thickness effect. For 662 keV photons in aluminum, the ideal narrow-beam Beer-Lambert model predicts transmissions of approximately 98.0% and 96.1% for 1 mm and 2 mm, respectively. Because a no-sample reference and complete pointwise uncertainty data were not available, absolute thickness, detection limit, and statistical significance were not claimed. The study therefore validates the acquisition-background-coordinate-mapping workflow and defines the metrological requirements for subsequent validation of the fully automated platform.

      Downloads

      Download data is not yet available.

      References

      [1] GUPTA, M.; KHAN, M. A.; BUTOLA, R.; SINGARI, R. M. Advances in applications of Non-Destructive Testing (NDT): A review. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, v. 8, n. 2, p. 2286-2307, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/2374068X.2021.1909332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2021.1909332

      [2] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY. Radiation Safety in Industrial Radiography. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-11. Vienna: IAEA, 2011.

      [3] KNOLL, G. F. Radiation Detection and Measurement. 4. ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.

      [4] WHITE, S. R.; MEGSON-SMITH, D. A.; ZHANG, K.; CONNOR, D. T.; MARTIN, P. G.; HUTSON, C.; HERRMANN, G.; DILWORTH, J.; SCOTT, T. B. Radiation Mapping and Laser Profiling Using a Robotic Manipulator. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, v. 7, 499056, 2020. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.499056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.499056

      [5] WANG, C.; LIU, Y.; JIANG, X.; HUANG, X.; WANG, X.; XIANG, Y.; HAN, Y.; WEI, L.; ZHANG, Z. Experiment validation of the high stability of long-term transmitted gamma photon counting of a new CdZnTe semiconductor detector and its preliminary applications. Radiation Detection Technology and Methods, v. 6, p. 317-322, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s41605-022-00330-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41605-022-00330-8

      [6] MEERE, B.; DOODEMAN, S.; VIDAL, F. P.; CHANFREUT, P.; TORTA, E.; et al. X-ray Image Generation for Robotic Radiography: a Case Study on Motion Blur in Drone-Based Wind Turbine Inspections. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, v. 44, art. 139, 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s10921-025-01279-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-025-01279-6

      [7] HE, Z. Review of the Shockley-Ramo theorem and its application in semiconductor gamma-ray detectors. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, v. 463, n. 1-2, p. 250-267, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00223-6

      [8] NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY. X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients: Aluminum. NIST Standard Reference Database 126. Gaithersburg: NIST. Available from the NIST Physical Measurement Laboratory. Accessed: 20 Sep. 2026.

      [9] ATTIX, F. H. Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527617135

      [10] AUTORIDADE NACIONAL DE SEGURANÇA NUCLEAR. Norma ANSN 3.01: Requisitos Básicos de Radioproteção e Segurança Radiológica de Fontes de Radiação. Resolução CNEN 344/25, DOU 07 Jul. 2025. Brasil, 2025.

      [11] SICILIANO, B.; KHATIB, O. Springer Handbook of Robotics. 2. ed. Cham: Springer, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1

      Downloads

      Published

      2026-09-22

      Data Availability Statement

      Os dados utilizados neste estudo estão disponíveis mediante solicitação ao autor correspondente.

      Issue

      Section

      Original Articles