Impact on dosimetry of occupationally exposed individuals on the patient management for PET/MRI studies: a comparison study with dosimetry on PET/CT

Emerson Itikawa; Heber Simões Videira; Uysha de Souza-Fonda; Priscila Soares Pires; R. Mondin; Ivani Bortoleti; Maria Inês Calil Cury Guimarães; Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel

doi:10.15392/2319-0612.2023.2154

Authors

Emerson N. Itikawa Federal University of Goiás https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5478-6203
Heber S. Videira Center of Nuclear Medicine of the Institute https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6647-399X
Uysha de Souza Fonda Center of Nuclear Medicine of the Institute of Radiology https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5614-923X
Priscila S. Pires Center of Nuclear Medicine of the Institute of Radiology
R. Mondin Center of Nuclear Medicine of the Instituto de Radiologia
Ivani Bortoleti Center of Nuclear Medicine of the Institute of Radiology
Maria Inês C. C. Guimarães Center of Nuclear Medicine of the Institute of Radiology
Carlos A. Buchpiguel Department of Radiology and Oncology of the School of Medicine of São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0956-2790

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2023.2154

Keywords:

dosimeter, TLD, Exposure, medical physics

Abstract

PET/MRI technology has expanded the boundaries of investigation in nuclear medicine, supported by the high sensitivity of solid-state PET detectors. Nonetheless, the coil positioning might lead to an increased exposure period of the worker to the injected patient. This procedure does not occur on PET/CT and, therefore, exposure period is reduced on such scanner. The aim of our study was to evaluate the dosimetry of two occupationally exposed individuals (OEI) working at the Center of Nuclear Medicine of Hospital das Clínicas of the University of Sao Paulo. We used thermoluminescent (TLD) dosimeters in pulse, whole-body and crystalline for PET/MRI and PET/CT procedures during five months of clinical and research routine. We also monitored the time for positioning/removing the patient on both scanners. For this study, OEI1 performed 76 PET/MRI studies and 102 PET/CT studies while OEI2 performed 26 and 56 PET/MRI and PET/CT studies, respectively. We found no evidence of differences for the whole-body dose values between both scanners (p = 0.22). The average time of patient management (positioning/removing the patient) was 14.38, and 3.81 minutes for PET/MRI and PET/CT, respectively. When the normalization by the number of PET/CT studies was applied, we found no statistical difference for effective and equivalent dose values. Our study encourages future investigations on nursing staff, which is a critical population that is exposed to ionizing radiation, mainly on dynamic studies, due to the synchronized injection with the protocol starting.

Views: 195
PDF Downloads: 169
XML Downloads: 11

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. C. Reilly et al., "Diagnosis and Monitoring of Osteoporosis With," (in eng), Semin Nucl Med, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 535-540, Nov 2018, doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.07.007.

D. H. Sung et al., "Localization of dystonic muscles with 18F-FDG PET/CT in idiopathic cervical dystonia," (in eng), J Nucl Med, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 1790-5, Nov 2007

K. J. Langen and N. Galldiks, "Update on amino acid PET of brain tumours," (in eng), Curr Opin Neurol, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 354-361, 08 2018

X. Sun et al., "A PET imaging approach for determining EGFR mutation status for improved lung cancer patient management," (in eng), Sci Transl Med, vol. 10, no. 431, Mar 2018

S. Keiding, M. Sørensen, K. Frisch, L. C. Gormsen, and O. L. Munk, "Quantitative PET of liver functions," (in eng), Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 73-85, 2018.

B. J. Pichler, A. Kolb, T. Nägele, and H. P. Schlemmer, "PET/MRI: paving the way for the next generation of clinical multimodality imaging applications," (in eng), J Nucl Med, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 333-6, Mar 2010

T. Beyer et al., "Acquisition protocol considerations for combined PET/CT imaging," (in eng), J Nucl Med, vol. 45 Suppl 1, pp. 25S-35S, Jan 2004.

U. Nestle et al., "Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer," (in eng), J Nucl Med, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1342-8, Aug 2005.

K. Lehmann et al., "FDG-PET-CT improves specificity of preoperative lymph-node staging in patients with intestinal but not diffuse-type esophagogastric adenocarcinoma," (in eng), Eur J Surg Oncol, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 196-202, Jan 2017

C. J. Nielsen, "Radiation Safety Certification: A Review," (in eng), J Nucl Med Technol, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 321-325, Dec 2018

ICRP-60. ICRP - Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection

P. B. Zanzonico, "Internal radionuclide radiation dosimetry: a review of basic concepts and recent developments," (in eng), J Nucl Med, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 297-308, Feb 2000.

A. Amaral, C. Itié, and B. Bok, "Dose Absorbed by Technologists in Positron Emission Tomography Procedures with FDG," Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, vol. 50, pp. 129-134, 2007.