Understanding and enhancing nuclear safety culture in nuclear power plants through a quantitative system dynamics model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2025.2819Keywords:
nuclear safety, safety culture, safety management, nuclear power plants, quantitative model, causal loop diagram and stock-and-flow diagrams, VENSIM PLE+ softwareAbstract
This study presents a quantitative system dynamics model developed to understand and enhance nuclear safety culture and operational performance in nuclear power plants. The model employs causal loop diagrams and stock-and-flow diagrams, created using Vensim PLE+ software, to capture and simulate the complex interactions that define safety culture dynamics. Recognizing the fundamental role of organizational culture in maintaining nuclear safety, the model incorporates key elements such as leadership, risk perception, continuous improvement, internal communication, and the commitment of management and personnel. Through an extensive literature review and expert consultations, the research integrates critical variables into the model, grounded in frameworks from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO). Simulating a decade of safety culture management dynamics, the model reveals the impact of management strategies, demonstrating the effectiveness of continuous improvement initiatives and proactive leadership in enhancing safety outcomes. Stress tests conducted under extreme scenarios validated the model's robustness, reaffirming its applicability in safeguarding safety culture under intensified production pressures. The findings provide actionable insights for nuclear safety professionals and decision-makers, promoting environments that support safety-focused practices. This model serves as a comprehensive tool to advance safety culture in nuclear operations, offering valuable perspectives for both theoretical discourse and practical nuclear safety management.
Downloads
References
[1] Budnitz, R. J., Rogner, H. H., & Shihab-Eldin, A. (2018). Expansion of nuclear power technology to new countries–SMRs, safety culture issues, and the need for an improved international safety regime. Energy Policy, 119, 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.051
[2] Orikpete, O. F., & Ewim, D. R. E. (2024). Interplay of human factors and safety culture in nuclear safety for enhanced organisational and individual performance: A comprehensive review. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 416, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2023.112797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2023.112797
[3] Korbut, T. N., Gurko, O. B., & Nautsyk, O. A. (2022). Development of safety culture in the Republic of Belarus in 2020–2021. Physics of Atomic Nuclei, 85(9), 1455-1458. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063778822090204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778822090204
[4] Badia, E., Navajas, J., & Losilla, J. M. (2020). Safety culture in the Spanish nuclear power plants through the prism of high reliability organization, resilience and conflicting objectives theories. Applied Sciences, 11(1), 345-370. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010345
[5] Gisquet, E., Beauquier, S., & Poulain, E. (2021). Revisiting safety culture: The benefits of a new cultural analysis framework for safety management. Nuclear Technology, 207(9), 1410-1422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1868891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1868891
[6] Kim, B. S., & Oh, Y. (2014). System thinking perspective on the dynamic relationship between organizational characteristics of nuclear safety culture. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 33(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.5143/jesk.2014.33.2.77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2014.33.2.77
[7] Akselsson, R., Jacobsson, A., Börjesson, M., Ek, Å., & Enander, A. (2012). Efficient and effective learning for safety from incidents. Work, 41, 3216-3222. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-2012-0661-3216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0661-3216
[8] Kirwan, B., Reader, T., & Parand, A. (2018). The safety culture stack–the next evolution of safety culture?. Safety and Reliability, 38(3), 200-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2018.1556505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2018.1556505
[9] Bernard, B. (2018). A safety culture maturity matrix for nuclear regulatory bodies. Safety, 4(4), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety4040044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/safety4040044
[10] Choi, Y., Jung, S. J., & Chung, Y. H. (2016). Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety culture and the validation study on the oversight model components. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 35(4), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.5143/jesk.2016.35.4.263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2016.35.4.263
[11] Qayoom, A., & HW Hadikusumo, B. (2019). Multilevel safety culture affecting organization safety performance: a system dynamic approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(10), 2326-2346. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-08-2018-0355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2018-0355
[12] Lomonaco, G., Mainardi, E., Marková, T., & Mazzini, G. (2021). Approaching nuclear safety culture in fission and fusion technology. Applied Sciences, 11(10), 4511-4525. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104511
[13] Reiman, T., Pietikäinen, E., Oedewald, P., & Gotcheva, N. (2012). System modeling with the DISC framework: evidence from safety-critical domains. Work, 41(Supplement 1), 3018-3025. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-2012-0558-3018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0558-3018
[14] Schöbel, M., Klostermann, A., Lassalle, R., Beck, J., & Manzey, D. (2017). Digging deeper! Insights from a multi-method assessment of safety culture in nuclear power plants based on Schein’s culture model. Safety Science, 95, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.01.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.01.012
[15] Acuña, G., Giménez, M., & Sánchez, M. (2023b). Safety culture and nuclear safety management. Analysis of the relationships of its variables through a bibliographic review and AHP. Proceedings of the 33rd European Conference On Safety And Reliability (ESREL), 3rd September – 8th September 2023, 1–8.
[16] Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[17] Sterman, J. (2002). System Dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
[18] Azar, A. T. (2012). System dynamics as a useful technique for complex systems. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 10(4), 377-410. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2012.046298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2012.046298
[19] de Gooyert, V. (2019). Developing dynamic organizational theories; three system dynamics based research strategies. Quality & Quantity, 53, 653-666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0781-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0781-y
[20] Kunc, M. (2024). Integrating system dynamics and scenarios: A framework based on personal experience. Futures & Foresight Science, 6(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.174
[21] Acuña, G., Giménez, M., Sánchez, M., Di Nardo, M., & Dag Øivind, M. (2023). Nuclear Safety Management: A Detailed Causal Model of Nuclear Power Plant Operation based on System Dynamics. Proceedings of the 32nd European Safety and Reliability Conference (pp. 3165–3172). Research Publishing, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-18-8071-1_p486-cd DOI: https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-18-8071-1_P486-cd
[22] IAEA. (2016). Leadership and management for safety: General Safety Requirements Part 2 (IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 2).
[23] WANO. (2019). Nuclear leadership effectiveness attributes (WANO PL 2019-01).
[24] Marais, K., Saleh, J. H., & Leveson, N. G. (2006). Archetypes for organizational safety. Safety Science, 44(7), 565-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004
[25] Cowing, M., Paté-Cornell M., Glynn P. (2004). Dynamic modeling of the tradeoff between productivity and safety in critical engineering systems. Safety Science 3, Vol. 9 , 269-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.02.003
[26] Kontogiannis, T., Boukas, D., & Malaki, C. (2019). A system dynamics approach in modeling business processes in safety management and production. In Total Safety and the Productivity Challenge (pp. 85-102). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108100-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108100-5
[27] Kouabenan, D. R., Ngueutsa, R., & Mbaye, S. (2015). Safety climate, perceived risk, and involvement in safety management. Safety Science, 77, 72-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.009
[28] Gisquet, E., & Older, M. (2015, April). A human and organizational factors perspective on the Fukushima nuclear accident - March 11 - March 15, 2011 (IRSN-PSN-SRDS-SFOHREX--2015-01). France. https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:46081850
[29] Martínez-Córcoles, M., Gracia, F., Tomás, I., & Peiró, J. M. (2011). Leadership and employees’ perceived safety behaviours in a nuclear power plant: A structural equation model. Safety Science, 49(8-9), 1118-1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.03.002
[30] Schöbel, M., Klostermann, A., Lassalle, R., Beck, J., & Manzey, D. (2017). Digging deeper! Insights from a multi-method assessment of safety culture in nuclear power plants based on Schein’s culture model. Safety Science, 95, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.01.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.01.012
[31] IAEA. (2007). Best practices in identifying, reporting and screening operating experience at nuclear power plants (IAEA-TECDOC-1581). International Atomic Energy Agency.
[32] Hamidi, N., Omidvari, M., & Meftahi, M. (2012). The effect of integrated management system on safety and productivity indices: Case study; Iranian cement industries. Safety Science, 50 (5), 1180-1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.01.004
[33] Morrow, S. L., Koves, G. K., & Barnes, V. E. (2014). Exploring the relationship between safety culture and safety performance in US nuclear power operations. Safety Science, 69, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.02.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.02.022
[34] Stemn, E., Bofinger, C., Cliff, D., & Hassall, M. E. (2019). Examining the relationship between safety culture maturity and safety performance of the mining industry. Safety Science, 113, 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.008
[35] Dainoff, M., Hanes, L., Hettinger, L., & Joe, J. C. (2020). Addressing human and organizational factors in nuclear industry modernization: An operationally focused approach to process and methodology (No. INL/EXT-20-57908-Rev000). Idaho National Lab (INL), Idaho Falls, ID, United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/1615671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/1615671
[36] Skeepers, N. C., & Mbohwa, C. (2015). A study on the leadership behaviour, safety leadership and safety performance in the construction industry in South Africa. *Procedia Manufacturing, 4, 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.008
[37] Gisquet, E., & Older, M. (2015). A human and organizational factors perspective on the Fukushima nuclear accident - March 11 - March 15, 2011 (IRSN-PSN-SRDS-SFOHREX--2015-01). France.
[38] Rollenhagen, C., Westerlund, J., & Näswall, K. (2013). Professional subcultures in nuclear power plants. Safety Science, 59, 78-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.05.00 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.05.004
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Santiago Gregorio Acuña, Marcelo Oscár Gim´enez, Mariela Grinberg, Ochuko Felix Orikpete, Warren Farr
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
How to Cite
