Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of patient positioning errors on single- isocenter multitarget stereotactic radiosurgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2025.2874Keywords:
radiosurgery, single isocenter, patient positioning errorsAbstract
Treating multiple brain metastases with a single isocenter enhances efficiency, but requires higher accuracy to account for rotation-induced shifts, which increase with the distance from the target to the isocenter. Twenty patients, previously treated at the institution, with single-isocenter radiosurgery for two targets were evaluated. This retrospective analysis’s objective was to assess if the setup margins sufficed to guarantee the minimum GTV coverage (V100% ≥ 95%), correlating target volumes and their respective distances to the isocenter with observed dosimetric impact. Plans with theoretical deviations were generated for translational and rotational errors of one millimeter and one degree, respectively. Coverage with prescription dose was evaluated for each of the plans, and such data was used to generate computational models. Rotational errors caused significantly larger coverage decreases, up to 60%, approximately. Any patient positioning deviation, translational or rotational, impaired coverage with statistical significance. However, only errors for pitch (LR) and roll (PA) caused significant GTV coverage decrease. It was possible to identify a negative correlation between the analyzed parameters, with target volume leading to greater dosimetric impact compared to distance to plan isocenter. In conclusion, for the evaluated sample, acceptable limits for patient setup deviations were adequate to ensure minimum GTV coverage for translational deviations up to one millimeter. Nevertheless, for one-degree rotational deviations, half of the patients presented insufficient GTV coverage. Data also indicates that smaller and farther targets might be at greater risk of compromised coverage considering patient positioning errors.
Downloads
References
[1] SACKS, P.; RAHMAN, M. Epidemiology of Brain Metastases. Neurosurgery Clinics, Estados Unidos da América, v. 31, n. 4, p. 481-488, 2020.
[2] HARTGERINK, D. et al. LINAC based stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: guidance for clinical implementation. Acta Oncologica, Suécia, v. 58, n. 9, p. 1275–1282, 2019.
[3] YAMAMOTO, M. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study. The Lancet Oncology. Inglaterra, v. 15, n. 4, p. 387-395, 2014.
[4] PINKHAM, M. B. et al. Neurocognitive Effects Following Cranial Irradiation for Brain Metastases. Clinical Oncology. Grã Bretanha, v. 27, n. 11, p. 630-369, 2015.
[5] VAN HERK, M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Seminars in Radiation Oncology. v. 14, n. 1, p. 52-64, 2004
[6] CHANG, J. A statistical model for analyzing the rotational error of single isocenter for multiple targets technique. Medical Physics. v. 44, n. 6, p. 2115-2123, 2017.
[7] ROPER, J. et al. Single-Isocenter Multiple-Target SRS: Risk of Compromised Coverage. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. Estados Unidos da América, v. 93, n. 3, p. 540-546, 2015.
[8] STANHOPE, C. et al. Physics considerations for single-isocenter, volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery for treatment of multiple intracranial targets. Practical Radiation Oncology. Estados Unidos da América, v. 6, n. 3, p. 207-213, 2016.
[9] VASQUES, M. M. et al. Analysis of the setup deviations generated in the 6D ExacTrac X-ray system for patients in hypofractionated intracranial radiosurgery treatments. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences. Rio de Janeiro, v. 7, n. 1, 2015.
[10] EMILIOZZI, C. Z. S. Aplicação de aprendizado de máquina para melhoria do fluxo de tratamento de radioterapia. 2023. Thesis (Master’s degree in Science) - IPEN, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2023.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mariana C. Souza, Caroline Castilhano Bueno, Caroline Zeppellini dos Santos Emiliozzi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing: The BJRS articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/