Analysis of the SWOT matrix as a strategy for implementing the Ap-Th1000 Reactor in Brazil

Francky Roger Araujo da Silva; Giovanni Laranjo de Stefani; Marcelo Vilela da Silva

doi:10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2405

Authors

Francky Roger Araujo da Silva Universidade Federal Fluminense
Giovanni Laranjo de Stefani Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Marcelo Vilela da Silva Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2405

Keywords:

ApTh-1000, Thorium, SWOT matrix

Abstract

This article analyzes the SWOT Matrix for the implementation of the AP-Th1000 reactor with thorium fuel, aiming at a future replacement of the current nuclear reactors that use uranium as fuel by thorium. There was a need for an in-depth study of the national and international literature linked to the Brazilian reality. After that, specific meetings were held to detect all possible situations of the 4 main points of the SWOT matrix. During the sessions, which averaged 1 hour, the authors' industrial and academic expertise was demonstrated in competencies such as creativity, collaboration, effective communication, openness and tolerance, quick thinking, synthesis ability, problem focus, and flexibility during the discussions of over 50 items found in the analysis of the 4 points of the SWOT matrix. Each meeting was divided into three parts. The first part, which would be the Creative phase; and a second part, which would be the Critical phase; and, finally, the third phase, where ideas are filtered for the permanence of those that were better founded and of better acceptance. Then, the aspects listed were classified into 4 categories: Strengths (S), Weaknesses (W), Opportunities (O), and Threats (T). After the classification, a ranking of priorities was made, in descending order of importance, according to the authors, of the weaknesses and threats, neutralization suggestions were made. Finally, the data obtained were analyzed. We concluded through the SWOT analysis, we can observe an expressive amount of benefits of using the AP1000 reactor with MOX of Thorium and Uranium in the development of nuclear energy generation technologies in Brazil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

RIBEIRO, D. Nuclear fission. Elementary Science Magazine, v. 2, n. 4, p. 108, 2014

NEA, 2010. Uranium 2009: Resources, production, and Demand, s.l.: OECD.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2020. Red Book: Uranium Resources, Production, and Demand. Retrieved on March 16, 2023, from https://www.iaea.org/publications/13531.

WORLD NUCLEAR ASSOCIATION (WNA). 2020. Nuclear Fuel Report. Retrieved on March 16, 2023, from https://www.world-nuclear.org/getmedia/0de02f5e-b74d-49d5-af77-3ca78825a5d0/wna-nuclear-fuel-report-2020-final.pdf.aspx

NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY (NEA), 2018. Uranium 2018: Resources, Production, and Demand. Retrieved on March 16, 2023, from https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2018/7413-uranium-2018.pdf

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA), 2005. Thorium fuel cycle – Potential benefits and challenges. IAEA-TECDOC 1450, Viena, 2005

KASTEN, P. R. (1998) Review of the Radkowsky Thorium reactor concept, Science & Global Security: The Technical Basis for Arms Control, Disarmament, and Nonproliferation Initiatives, 7:3, 237-269, DOI: 10.1080/08929889808426462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08929889808426462

SILVA, J.G. Reliability study of the AP1000 reactor for the large LOCA scenario in the context of a Tier 1 APS. Thesis, M.Sc in Nuclear Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 109 pages, 2005.

MAIORINO, J. R.; Stefani, G. L.; MOREIRA, J. M. L.; ROSSI, P. C. R.; SANTOS, T. A. . Feasibility to convert an advanced PWR from UO2 to a mixed U/ThO2 core - Part I: Parametric studies. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, v. 102, p. 47-55, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.12.010

GALPERIN, A., REICHERT, P. & RADKOWSKY, A. (1997): Thorium fuel for light water reactors—reducing proliferation potential of nuclear power fuel cycle, Science & Global Security: The Technical Basis for Arms Control, Disarmament, and Nonproliferation Initiatives, 6:3, 265-290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08929889708426440

STEFANI G.L., MAIORINO J.R., LOUSADA J.M. The AP-TH 1000 – An advanced concept to MOX of thorium in a closed fuel cycle. Int J Energy Res 2020; 1-14. https://doiorg/10.1002/er5421

SANTOS, M.C., FERNANDES, M. The swot analysis tool in the process of formulating strategic actions in small companies. a case study at magnu jd construction company são paulo ltda. Fatec sebrae magazine in a debate: management, technologies, and business. v. 2, no. 2, p. 11-126, 2015

CERTO, S. C. & Peter, P. J. Strategic Management: Strategy Planning and Implementation. Translated by Steffen, Flávio D. São Paulo: Pearson, 1993.

TARAPANOFF, K. Organizational, and competitive intelligence. Brasília: Editora UnB, 2001.

GONÇALVES, L. C., MAIORINO, J. R. Comparison of open cycles of uranium and mixed thorium-uranium oxides using advanced reactors. International Nuclear Atlantic Conference - INAC 2017.

SILVA, A T. The future of nuclear energy. Magazine USP, São Paulo, n.76, p. 34-43, December / February 2007-2008.

GUIMARÃES L. S. MATTOS J. R. L. The Nuclear Option to Contribute to Clean and Sustainable Electricity Production. 3rd International Workshop | Advances in Cleaner Production. “CLEANER PRODUCTION INITIATIVES AND CHALLENGES FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD” São Paulo – Brazil – May 18th-20ndth – 2011

KAUR, G., et al. (2018). A review on thorium fuel cycle for nuclear energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 3051-3064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.064

RAMASWAMI, A., et al. (2016). Thorium fuel cycle for nuclear energy: An overview. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 87, 97-132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2015.11.009

ALONSO, A., et al. (2012). Critical comparison of two thorium fuel cycles: Potential benefits and drawbacks. Energy Conversion and Management, 64, 313-327.

JONES, P., HILLIER, D., & Comfort, D. (2016). Sustainability and triple bottom line reporting–what is it all about? Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(3), 177-190.

Bruce Power. (n.d.). Community Investment Program. Retrieved on March 17, 2023, from https://www.brucepower.com/community/community-investment-program/.

Kori Nuclear Power Plant. (n.d.). Social Contribution. Retrieved on March 17, 2023, from http://www.kori-np.co.kr/eng/csr/csr01.asp

EDF. (n.d.). Gravelines Nuclear Power Plant: Supporting people with disabilities. Retrieved on March 17, 2023, from https://www.edf.fr/en/the-edf-group/who-we-are/locations/gravelines-nuclear-power-plant/supporting-people-with-disabilities

OETTINGENL, M. and SKOLIK, K. Numerical design of the Seed-Blanket Unit for the thorium nuclear fuel cycle. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20161000067. E3S Web of Conferences 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20161000067

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA) (2005). Thorium fuel cycle – Potential benefits and challenges. IAEA-TECDOC 1450, Viena, 2005

Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) 6895. Retrieved on January 27, 2022, from https://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=6201319.

OLIVEIRA, F., & REIS, N. (2018). SWOT analysis: A theoretical review. Journal of Management and Marketing Review, 3(1), 37-44.

KUMAR, S., & SINGH, T. (2018). Quantitative SWOT analysis for competitive prioritization in the iron ore mining industry. Journal of Central South University, 25(5), 1065-1078.

HITT, M., IRELAND, R., & HOSKISSON, R. (2016). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases: Competitiveness and Globalization. Cengage Learning.

RADKOWSKY, A., and GALPERIN, A. (1998). The nonproliferative light water reactor: A new approach to light water reactor core technology. Nuclear Technology 124:215–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13182/NT98-A2921

RAITSES, G., GALPERIN, A., & TODOSOW, M. (2012). Non-Proliferative, Thorium-Based, Core and Fuel Cycle for Pressurized Water Reactors. Upton, New York: Brookhaven National Laboratory.